.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ShadowSD.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ShadowSD:154154"][B]It is an absolute FACT that Kerry will beat Bush in Massachussetts no matter what. Therefore, voting for either Bush or Kerry in this state is meaningless. If you live in MA and you don't like Kerry, vote for a third party candidate like Nader and maybe we'll have a shot at more than two choices in future elections! YOU ARE NOT RISKING ELECTING BUSH IN ANY WAY. Bush or Kerry have way too big an advantage to overcome in most US states, so it boggles my fucking mind that people those states are still afraid that not voting for Kerry might risk electing Bush. GET A CLUE! If I lived in New Hampshire or Ohio or Florida or Pennsylvania, I would cast my vote for a hamster if the Democrats nominated him, as long as it meant getting Bush out of office. But for those of us who live MA, CT, RI, VT, NY and other overwhelmingly "blue states", THERE'S NO LOGICAL REASON TO CONSIDER VOTING FOR KERRY IF YOU HAVE RESERVATIONS ABOUT HIM.[/B] (I'm not bitching at anyone here per se, this is just something that really irritates me in general) [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][