.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Joe/NotCommon.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Joe/NotCommon:155929"]Someone on my myspace list sent this bulletin: Why Badnarik? As a Libertarian who opposed the Iraq war and the USA PATRIOT Act, I am voting for Libertarian Michael Badnarik. Those of us who opposed the war and the policies of this Justice Department have little reason to vote for John Kerry, who also supported the war and the PATRIOT Act. Kerry has even intimated that he would maintain the occupation in Iraq for a longer period than the Bush administration would. A Kerry victory would mean little for social liberals. At the same time, those of us who are concerned about federal spending have no reason to fear a Kerry victory, despite the fact that Kerry's domestic policy proposals are mostly worse than those of George W. Bush. Federal spending rose faster under Bush than it did under Clinton, proving once again the virtues of divided government. A President Kerry would be unable to pass his more radical proposals in the face of Republican congressional opposition. A Bush victory would mean little for fiscal conservatives. Whether Bush or Kerry wins is of marginal importance, and it is more appropriate in this election to cast a vote for long-term, fundamental change, which growing third-party support could ultimately effect.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][