.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to DreamingInExile.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="DreamingInExile:256310"]the_reverend said:[QUOTE]I would give the Q 28-90 and 70-300 a grade of a D.[/QUOTE] I'll agree, but my current SLR isn't a super nice one either, I've got a Nikon N65, it's a middle of the road camera. and it came with the 28-90, I needed a lens with Macro capability hence the inexpensive 70-300 (was the best option for me at the time). the_reverend said:[QUOTE]um... a D2H isn't that much... they are going for under $2K. but if you are worried about size, it's massive compared to the n80 body. [/QUOTE] I know the D2h isn't "expensive" but seeing since I don't have the >$2k to spend on a body and pick up other equipment at the same time, it's a waste for me to buy a camera that nice until I have the gear to back it up. the_reverend said:[QUOTE]the d100 is the esentially same size as the d70/d70s. the d100 just weights a little more (due to the metal substructure). So, you don't mean bulky, you mean the D100 is heavier than the D70. [/QUOTE] yeah, I was referring to the weight not the overall size, sorry I should have clarified that.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.014 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][