.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ArrowHead nli.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ArrowHead%20nli:379274"]handinjury said:[QUOTE]REV, How much are you looking to spend? Whats wrong with prostools? Geesh that and digital performer is only the Industry standard. [/QUOTE] First, it's the recording industry standard. Rev runs a radio station. Secondly, it's an EXPENSIVE standard with a very high learning curve. Rev doesn't need 90% of the higher level features and abilities, and it's HARDWARE EXCLUSIVE, which means instead of being able to buy another 8 channels of audio for $500 he'd have to spend $1600 for a Digi002. Pro tools is not an idustry standard. It's like mac, they're system exclusive and they were there first. Therefore, people that started with pro tools hae stuck with it. Pro tools is just software. Quality comes from your pre's, converters, and signal path, NOT from your pro-tools audio engine. There's a lot of amazing stuff I've heard coming out of studios using Nuendo, Cubase, Sonar and Logic. Just check out www.myspace.com/tesseract , all done with Nuendo. If rev were starting a recording studio, the benefits of running the same system everyone else uses might make pro-tools worth the money. For what he's doing now, there ARE no advantages. (except that everything is bundled with pro-tools, no having to install hardware and software from different [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][