.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to the_reverend.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="the_reverend:21308"]get a 50mm 1.8 first ($100 brand new) and then look at other lenses. also, make sure you if you get a zoom lens, make is a f-2.8 or lower lens. 3.5 and up sux balls unless you are going to be out side in bright light shooting. lens 24mm 1.8 (sigma) f 2.0 @ 1/15 freaking low lighting ISO 1000 [IMG]http://www.returntothepit.com/media.php?id=46305[/IMG] lens 28-70mm 2.8 (sigma) f2.8 @ 1/30 semi-low lighting ISO 800 [IMG]http://www.returntothepit.com/media.php?id=47118&pic=/pics/july192003/opeth030.jpg[/IMG] all the other pictures on this site (after 2/21/03) are with my 17-35mm f2.8-4. it's awesome at 17mm in low light, aove 20mm (f 3.3) it sucks. and in lots of lighting it sucks. Succubus has the 24-70mm 2.8 sigma lens. it's alot bigger than my 28-70 2.8, and gives you a touch more in the wide end.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][