.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to anonymous.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="anonymous:393051"]the thing is, you lose all of the dynamics of the vocals it sounds muffled bottom line as far as the guitars? dont put them through the monitors, problem solved. use your amp for stage monitor, this is pretty normal practice. monitors are generally a bit more for vocals. the crowd certainly does not hear what you hear onstage. they have the drums overpowering things, the further distance between them and the speakers, the room geometry affecting things, etc. Also, to acheive anything close to a proper setup, one would not be mixing the show from the stage anyway, so technically the band shouldn't need to hear what the crowd hears. now I don't know what the webster has but I'm willing to reckon that it's not the fault of their monitors, rather, it's that the guitar is run at such a low volume that what you're hearing is the amp clipping out, rather than the speaker farting. I honestly doubt such a large venue with regular touring acts would have sub-par monitors. Also generally monitors cut back a bit on the high end to eliminate feedback spots for mobile vocalists, and also you mentioned you cut back the presence quite a bit. So this would account for your lack of hearing it. I mean, I applaud your effort, but, for fuck's sake there is a standard way of doing things for a reason: it works.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.011 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][