.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to DrinkHardThrashHard.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="DrinkHardThrashHard:424190"]BestialOnslaught said:[QUOTE] While you may be old as hell and have been listening to some of this stuff almost a decade or so longer than I, that doesn't mean the classifications you and your pals were using were the same worldwide ;) [/QUOTE] I'm a few years younger than hell. I must point out though that actually the classifications we were using were pretty much the same worldwide...that's where we got them from, magazines and tape trading from everywhere...we didn't create them ourselves. Tape trading from Sweden, Germany, Canada, France, Brazil, Mexico, and all over the States. But none of these people were calling Venom death or black metal (even though it was the name of one of their records). Then again, even the abbreviation NWOBHM was not in widespread use until the 90s. If I was teaching any course of Metal 101, I would definitely have Venom in there, they'd be the 2nd or 3rd chapter in. BUT DAMNIT THE KIDS WILL KNOW CIRITH UNGOL![/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][