.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to PatMeebles.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="PatMeebles:432351"]Then serendipity went onto the "window" argument. They reuse their belief that PM is cherry-picking straw man arguments that nobody really uses. When this article came out, that movie which was narrated by some hippie-looking Mr. Rogers wannabe used the windows claim as an argument. Granted, it wasn't as huge as the "pentagon has no debris" argument, but it was still argued by the main proponents of the fringe left. However, since they didn't bother to really argue with PM's debunking of the window, they decided to attack FEMA by saying they faked a photo. To do so, they assumed, without any real evidence, that the two photos they compared were taken within minutes of each other. Since they then claimed that objects were conspiculously missing from the first photograph (nevermind shadowing caused by different angles and the fact that smoke doesn't always float in solid one color blocks), and that the coloring was brighter in the first photo (nevermind lighting angles and where the sun was at the time of each photo; oh wait, they must have been from the same time because they said so!) that FEMA was in on the plot. Give me a break.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.016 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][