.:.:.:.:RTTP.Mobile:.:.:.:.
[<--back] [Home][Pics][News][Ads][Events][Forum][Band][Search]
full forum | bottom

---

Reply
[login ]
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ShadowSD.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ShadowSD:440753"]Well put. As unwilling as Democrats have been to be a strong opposition party, the fact is that in office, none of them would be anywhere near as bad as Bush. In fact, most Republicans would be better than him. The problem with Bush is that neo-conservatives have hijacked this country for the last five years, despite the fact that no one was elected running on neo-con policies; if anything Bush ran against them, criticizing nation-building in the 2000 debate. So the dilemna of the Bush Presidency goes way beyond Republican vs. Democrat. Most Republicans would have found the war on terror more important than nation building in Iraq. Most Republicans would care remotely about deficits and spending. Instead, we end up with Ann Coulter meets Alfred E. Neuman as our President. [/QUOTE]

top [Vers. 0.12][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][refresh][