.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to retzam.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="retzam:27590"]the_reverend said:[QUOTE]retzam said:[QUOTE]That isnt the Law of Detachment I was refering to. An example of what I was talking about would be: If a, then b. Assuming a is true, then b must also be true. The two facts you gave ("All hot guys are homosexual";"I am not homosexual") would act as a, so be would be "I am not hot". My math teacher would be so proud.[/QUOTE] no... (s)he wouldn't.. cause you got it wrong. that is a false argument. that's the type of arguement that people use to convince people of things all the time... you need dual cuasal relationships to allow for that... aka bidirectionalimplies. <=> a since implies (=>) only allows a relationship to flow one direction. I can prove it with set theory and some nice venn diagrams if you want me to...[/QUOTE] Well, your statement is a bidirectional statement. You see, your conditional statement ("All hot guys are homosexuals") can be changed into the form: If a guy is hot, then he is a homosexual. This means that...fuck your right. Nevermind. I don't know why, but before now I didn't realize that this statement doesnt mean that all homosexuals are hot. I renounce my argument.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][