Pathfinder Trailer[views:2800][posts:19]___________________________________________ [Mar 29,2007 5:54pm - FuckIsMySignature ""] This looks to be dominant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puffer_fish#Tetrodotoxin :doublehorns: |
| ____________________________________ [Mar 29,2007 6:33pm - Kinslayer ""] Um...what? Thats a link to a puffer fish. Here's what you meant to post...kinda: http://imdb.com/title/tt0446013/ |
| ____________________________________ [Mar 29,2007 6:34pm - RichHorror ""] Finally, a movie about a SUV! Oh wait, that's the Transformers movie. Nevermind. |
| ___________________________________________ [Mar 29,2007 9:09pm - FuckIsMySignature ""] ha! yeah i was wicked stoned and they were talking about how puffer fish toxin creates zombism on the history channel. |
| ___________________________________ [Mar 29,2007 10:19pm - dertoxia ""] i want to see this movie so bad. it looks overdone but i dont care. i remember seeing something on the history channel when i was young that vikings were the first civilization to come to the americas. i asked one of my history teachers about it and they completely blew it off and said i didnt know what i was talking about. |
| ____________________________________ [Mar 29,2007 10:37pm - dreadkill ""] this movie was supposed to come out last year. it keeps getting pushed back. even though it is historically inaccurate, i've been wanting to see it because it looks awesome. |
| _______________________________________________ [Mar 30,2007 6:23am - WhyamIandasshole nli ""] More movies with half naked men and swords. |
| _______________________________ [Mar 30,2007 10:37am - Yeti ""] yeah the history behind it is totally inaccurate, but it is just a movie. |
| ______________________________________ [Mar 30,2007 12:07pm - sacreligion ""] the only promising thing about this movie is the marketing. you know a movie's gotta be good when they go out of their way to say "rated R for strong brutal violence throughout" in the commercial |
| ___________________________________ [Mar 30,2007 12:45pm - powerkok ""] Fuck yes...Ive been waiting for this.....was delayed from a January date. |
| _______________________________________ [Mar 30,2007 1:02pm - y_ddraig_goch ""] powerkok said:Fuck yes...Ive been waiting for this.....was delayed from a January date. October was when it was originally promoted for release |
| _____________________________________ [Mar 30,2007 1:27pm - sacreligion ""] either way it should still be sufficiently awesome i'll definitely pay to see this in a theater |
| ____________________________________________ [Mar 30,2007 2:20pm - ConquerTheBaphomet ""] I saw this preview when I saw 300 last night and it looks amazing. I would see it opening night. |
| ___________________________________ [Mar 31,2007 1:03am - dreadkill ""] y_ddraig_goch said:powerkok said:Fuck yes...Ive been waiting for this.....was delayed from a January date. October was when it was originally promoted for release it was supposed to come out in september |
| ___________________________________ [Apr 6,2007 9:02am - Kinslayer ""] It looks fucking laughable. Totally over the top cheesy, grossly overexagerated and historically inaccurate... |
| _____________________________ [Apr 6,2007 9:04am - Mess ""] i agree with Kinslayer. it's too bad they can't come out with a better historical movie based in those times. |
| __________________________________________ [Apr 6,2007 9:14am - FuckIsMySignature ""] Mess said:i agree with Kinslayer. it's too bad they can't come out with a better historical movie based in those times. Thats what the History Channel is for. |
| _____________________________ [Apr 6,2007 9:24am - Mess ""] yeah, and books i suppose. a well put together movie would be nice though. |
| ______________________________ [Apr 6,2007 10:51am - Yeti ""] Kinslayer said:It looks fucking laughable. Totally over the top cheesy, grossly overexagerated and historically inaccurate... yeah but its just based off of a graphic novel, its not supposed to represent any kind of history. the only thing i can see about making the "vikings" out to be so maniacal is thats how they must have looked in the eyes of the enemy. if the movie is good, it will be easy to overlook the inaccuracy. |
| _______________________________________ [Apr 6,2007 12:35pm - y_ddraig_goch ""] Yeti said:Kinslayer said:It looks fucking laughable. Totally over the top cheesy, grossly overexagerated and historically inaccurate... yeah but its just based off of a graphic novel, its not supposed to represent any kind of history. the only thing i can see about making the "vikings" out to be so maniacal is thats how they must have looked in the eyes of the enemy. if the movie is good, it will be easy to overlook the inaccuracy. It's based of a 1970's movie called "the vikings" |