.:.:.:.:RTTP.Mobile:.:.:.:.
[<--back] [Home][Pics][News][Ads][Events][Forum][Band][Search]
full forum | bottom

Did they make a 3rd Pirates of the Caribbean that comes out in like 3 weeks?

[views:1514][posts:16]
 _________________________________________
[May 7,2007 11:55am - SacreligionNLI  ""]
I just saw an add for this on the myspace.

"Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" or something like that, May 25th.

I hadn't heard anything about this until just now, which is weird because they usually hype the fuck out of these movies
 __________________________________
[May 7,2007 12:03pm - SteveOTB ""]
Yeah it's kindof weird. I found out about this yesterday. Shouldn't this be the movie to be hyped for like 3 months?
 __________________________________
[May 7,2007 12:08pm - Niccolai ""]
The trailer has been in moview previews, it's just that there have only been like 3 movies that people have been going to see since they showed the trailer.

If you've gone and seen like 9 movies in the past two months, you'd be sick of the pirates trailer.

Kindof like that fucking 'The Reaping' comercial that was played every 8 seconds on every TV channel for the past year.
 _________________________________________
[May 7,2007 12:09pm - SacreligionNLI  ""]
haha, i already forgot about that movie
 ______________________________
[May 7,2007 12:37pm - Yeti ""]
SacreligionNLI said:I just saw an add for this on the myspace.

"Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" or something like that, May 25th.

I hadn't heard anything about this until just now, which is weird because they usually hype the fuck out of these movies



even though you saw an ad for it, no, they did not.
 ___________________________________
[May 7,2007 12:41pm - ariavette ""]
I'm a big fan of these movies but when I heard they made another one I had to sigh. Hollywood just doesn't know when to stop.
 ___________________________________
[May 7,2007 12:42pm - ariavette ""]
The second one wasn't nearly as funny as the first and about a half hour to long
 ______________________________
[May 7,2007 12:43pm - Yeti ""]
see i loved the second one just as much as the first.
 __________________________________
[May 7,2007 12:45pm - Niccolai ""]
ariavette said:I'm a big fan of these movies but when I heard they made another one I had to sigh. Hollywood just doesn't know when to stop.


They announced there would be a trilogy before the first one ever even came out, The second and third were filmed at the same time, and the second one ended with a to be continued.

So it's not like hollywood is trying to slip something past people to make extra money and ruin a movie.
 __________________________________
[May 7,2007 1:04pm - dreadkill ""]
i'm still holding on to the hope that hollywood will make C.H.U.D. 3.
 __________________________________________
[May 7,2007 1:21pm - FuckIsMySignature ""]
Swashbuckle should do the soundtrack for this movie
 ________________________________________
[May 7,2007 1:22pm - metal_church101 ""]
I couldn't ne bothered to see the first two.
 _________________________________
[May 7,2007 1:23pm - SteveOTB ""]
FuckIsMySignature said:Swashbuckle should do the soundtrack for this movie


I like the idea of having Scury doing the soundtrack for this movie.

Swim with the sharks mother fucker!
 ________________________________________
[May 7,2007 1:23pm - SacreligionNLI  ""]
i have yet to see the second one, although i'm pretty sure i have the gist of it

"johnny depp, slash slash, bang bang, keira knightley, hot, hot, hot, orlando bloom, girls in theater screaming, some more action, something about a pirate, to be continued"
 _____________________________
[May 7,2007 1:26pm - Yeti ""]
not even close. its really fucking good. i like the fact that it was almost 3 hours. if a movie is capable of holding my interest for 3 hours, i am all for it. like the directors cut of Return of the King. i think that 5 hours is absolutely necessary.
 _________________________________
[May 7,2007 1:29pm - SteveOTB ""]
Yeti said:not even close. its really fucking good. i like the fact that it was almost 3 hours. if a movie is capable of holding my interest for 3 hours, i am all for it. like the directors cut of Return of the King. i think that 5 hours is absolutely necessary.


I can't imagine watching a movie that almost takes up a full work day.
 ________________________________________
[May 7,2007 1:32pm - SacreligionNLI  ""]
i stand by my assumption


Reply
[login ]
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
message

top [Vers. 0.12][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][refresh][