.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to KeithMutiny.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="KeithMutiny:657199"]immortal13 said:[QUOTE]KeithMutiny said:[QUOTE]take it from someone who has done both. Turbo it, fuck the supercharger.[/QUOTE] Superchargers offer power on demand because they run from a belt straight from the crank. Turbochargers only offer boost when the turbine finally spools up to speed, which-depending on the size of the turbo-could take quite a while. With my car being a V6, a twin turbo kit would be more likely because there's two exhaust manifolds with plenty of room for turbos, only problem is getting a second turbo is a lot more expensive than just one or a supercharger. Not to mention superchargers can boost up to 20 PSI, where the max I've ever heard of coming from an aftermarket turbo would be around 15 PSI, which is a good amount, but more is better, especially with the bottom end work I'll be doing (crank, rods, pistons, etc.), I don't wanna do all that work for a minimal amount of boost.[/QUOTE] you dont need to explain, i used to build performance cars for a living. but thanks. you can get 40+ out of a properly built turbo by the way. if you push 20 with a supercharger for long enough, it will explode. if you do a supercharger, you will regret it, im telling you this right now from personal expierience. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.011 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][