.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ArrowHead likes Pie.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ArrowHead%20likes%20Pie:661179"]the_reverend said:[QUOTE] and arrowhead, external drives are use for back up, not running. so it doesn't matter how long it takes to defrag (cmd your defreg and schedule it anyhow) and it's a back up not running so it dosnt need to be defragged or atleast not aggressively since it's not a running drive. adding to that is that externals usually have HUGE files send to them so they are less likely to fragment the file system. but hey, you retards can waste ya money if ya want.[/QUOTE] Interesting. However, pretty flawed logic. If you were doing anything with video or audio work you'd quickly find that external drives are used not only for backup, but also for quick and easy transportation of large files or collections of files. In the audio recording world external drives are very common for per-project usage. Many studios will purchase a single external drive for a single project, which allows for the files to be easily moved from studio to studio and also simplifies the archive process. When you only NEED 100-200 GIG for an audio project, why the hell would you spend TWICE the price just because it's a better value? But hey, you retards can waste ya money if ya want. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][