Virgin sued for using teen's photo[views:1423][posts:4]______________________________________ [Sep 26,2007 9:20am - the_reverend ""] http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/virg...photo/2007/09/21/1189881735928.html [img] |
| __________________________________ [Sep 26,2007 9:27am - succubus ""] People who post photos on Flickr are asked how they want to license their attribution. The youth counsellor chose a sharing licence from Creative Commons that allows others to reuse work such as photos without violating copyright laws, if they credit the photographer and say where the photo was taken. His Flickr page appears at the bottom of the ad. ^^^ umm ok |
| ______________________________________ [Sep 26,2007 9:32am - the_reverend ""] yeah. creative common's licenses are for the birds. |
| _________________________________________ [Sep 26,2007 10:27am - DestroyYouAlot ""] I thought this thread was about MSD or RichHorror. |
| ________________________________ [Sep 26,2007 1:08pm - xmikex ""] I almost get the creative common license thing, but it's still her likeness, she's got to be entitled to at least some rights. And yes, the thread title totally lead me to believe it'd be gross |