.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to C.DEAD.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="C.DEAD:692929"]DestroyYouAlot said:[QUOTE]C.DEAD said:[QUOTE]I don't think you have a problem. I love the MGS series so much, and i was not aware that the Subsistence had the sequel on it. Very interesting. MGS3 however, was not nearly as good as MGS2, thats by far the best one. Hard to follow, but so so amazingly great.[/QUOTE] I don't know; I was into the whole "Bond" feel, and the story was a little more coherent in 3, IMHO. Plus the CQC thing was sweet. Rev, the end of MGS3 is seriously an hour and a half long, with maybe 15 minutes of play sprinkled throughout. I spent forever trying to clear the last boss, and then my GF and I just sat there going "WTF?!?" for the feature-length movie that followed. Redonkulous.[/QUOTE] Oh yeah, I totally agree. The story was easier to follow in MGS3, though not exactly better. I just thought all around MGS2 was better. Mother of god that fucking ending was so long. It wouldn't end. I remember as soon as i beat it my friend Ben came over and was like, "What the shit are you watching?". He then proceeded to watch the entire thing with me. We are total losers.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][