Beat any breathalyzer test.[views:7827][posts:46]______________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 12:45am - horror_tang ""] I have found a way to beat the test. Do you think this innovation would be worth selling? How much would you be willing to pay? Curious because if I go forward with this it will take a lot of money to market. |
_____________________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 12:47am - theaccurseddrummer ""] Look dude, I'm telling you, nobody's going to buy into sipping your secret sauce to try and beat a Breathalyzer, there's enough Xanax in that shit to kill a moose, so either way you'd get tagged for a DUI. |
______________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 12:50am - horror_tang ""] No, I am dead serious. This is no mystical Xanax mixture. This is the real deal. I have a worked on a few inventions and this seems like it could be the most marketable. |
______________________________ [Dec 12,2007 12:53am - ZJD ""] I don't know if this is supposed to turn into a joke later on in the thread, but I think marketing a product to allow people to more comfortably drive drunk is stupid. |
___________________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 12:54am - davefromthegrave ""] horror_tang said:No, I am dead serious. This is no mystical Xanax mixture. This is the real deal. I have a worked on a few inventions and this seems like it could be the most marketable. [img] |
___________________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 12:55am - davefromthegrave ""] [img] |
______________________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 1:32am - Fuck_Logging_In_NLI ""] ZJD said:I don't know if this is supposed to turn into a joke later on in the thread, but I think marketing a product to allow people to more comfortably drive drunk is stupid. oh...look who it is; mister I don't need alcohol to enjoy life :moe: |
______________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 11:15am - horror_tang ""] This is not a joke. Allowing the government to dictate whether or not we can drink and drive is an infringement on our civil liberties. "But it's for or own good." Well, now you have to wear a seatbelt. Yes, statistically there has been shown to be a 50% intoxicant related causal rate of motor vehicle accident deaths (notice I did not say alcohol related). That means 50% are from sober drivers. When a driver dies in a car accident and alcohol and drugs are found in their system, it is reported as a drunk driving fatality. Was it the drugs or the alcohol? Who compiled the statistics? The truth is that the leading cause of motor vehicle accident deaths is driver distraction. Talking on a cell phone or eating breakfast on the way to work while driving is more likely to cause a motor vehicle fatality than someone driving drunk. The true number of deaths caused by drunk drivers is more comparable to deaths caused by drivers that fall asleep behind the wheel. |
______________________________ [Dec 12,2007 11:24am - pam ""] Can you market being huge and terrifying? I'm pretty sure cops just pull you over and say "fuck that". |
______________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 11:25am - horror_tang ""] That's my own thing. I have somethin else for the masses. |
______________________________ [Dec 12,2007 11:29am - pam ""] I can safely say that 99% of the times I've almost been killed in a car was due to some white-hat schmuck in a shitty Japanese car trying to do 100 through traffic on the highway or because some fucking idiot on their cell phone isn't watching the road. |
_______________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 11:31am - zymosis nli ""] Um...and being shitplastered behind the wheel isn't driver distraction? Using up what brain power you've got left at that point to "keep it between the lines" or not slam into someone or something? Listen man, I understand your point..but I've got more than a few friends with DUIs and a few who have lost family members to drunk drivers and that shit is no joke. This whole "you're only as drunk as you think you are" is completely ridiculous. If you fail a breathalyzer, it's your own fault and you probably should've though of that before you decided to get hammered and cruise around. That shit just doesn't make sense...if you wanna beat a breathalyzer, DON'T GET IN THE FUCKING CAR...it's called a Taxi..check it out sometime. |
____________________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 12:39pm - FuckIsMySignature ""] pam said:I can safely say that 99% of the times I've almost been killed in a car was due to some white-hat schmuck in a shitty Japanese car trying to do 100 through traffic on the highway or because some fucking idiot on their cell phone isn't watching the road. oh ya sorry bout that. |
_______________________________ [Dec 12,2007 12:43pm - Yeti ""] driving is just altogether hazardous to your health. being drunk on the Shoeleather Express isn't illegal or dangerous. |
_____________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 1:03pm - unholy_dave ""] moral values aside...if you have something that will help people avoid DUI's, and is something tangible that you can market and sell, then yes, you will definitely be able to make some coin. |
_________________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 1:27pm - Swollen Donkey ""] horror_tang said:This is not a joke. Allowing the government to dictate whether or not we can drink and drive is an infringement on our civil liberties. "But it's for or own good." Well, now you have to wear a seatbelt. Yes, statistically there has been shown to be a 50% intoxicant related causal rate of motor vehicle accident deaths (notice I did not say alcohol related). That means 50% are from sober drivers. When a driver dies in a car accident and alcohol and drugs are found in their system, it is reported as a drunk driving fatality. Was it the drugs or the alcohol? Who compiled the statistics? The truth is that the leading cause of motor vehicle accident deaths is driver distraction. Talking on a cell phone or eating breakfast on the way to work while driving is more likely to cause a motor vehicle fatality than someone driving drunk. The true number of deaths caused by drunk drivers is more comparable to deaths caused by drivers that fall asleep behind the wheel. your a fucking moron! Infringmens on our civil liberties? dude it's a law! Just shut up, no ones gonna buy this shit! |
_____________________________ [Dec 12,2007 1:29pm - pam ""] FuckIsMySignature said:pam said:I can safely say that 99% of the times I've almost been killed in a car was due to some white-hat schmuck in a shitty Japanese car trying to do 100 through traffic on the highway or because some fucking idiot on their cell phone isn't watching the road. oh ya sorry bout that. Every time you leave Ralph's I spend all night wondering how you get home alive. |
_____________________________ [Dec 12,2007 1:29pm - pam ""] Swollen Donkey said:horror_tang said:This is not a joke. Allowing the government to dictate whether or not we can drink and drive is an infringement on our civil liberties. "But it's for or own good." Well, now you have to wear a seatbelt. Yes, statistically there has been shown to be a 50% intoxicant related causal rate of motor vehicle accident deaths (notice I did not say alcohol related). That means 50% are from sober drivers. When a driver dies in a car accident and alcohol and drugs are found in their system, it is reported as a drunk driving fatality. Was it the drugs or the alcohol? Who compiled the statistics? The truth is that the leading cause of motor vehicle accident deaths is driver distraction. Talking on a cell phone or eating breakfast on the way to work while driving is more likely to cause a motor vehicle fatality than someone driving drunk. The true number of deaths caused by drunk drivers is more comparable to deaths caused by drivers that fall asleep behind the wheel. your a fucking moron! Infringmens on our civil liberties? dude it's a law! Just shut up, no ones gonna buy this shit! You'RE*, moron. |
_____________________________ [Dec 12,2007 1:30pm - pam ""] Jeff is infringemen'in on RTTP's moral values!! |
______________________________ [Dec 12,2007 3:18pm - Yeti ""] pam said:FuckIsMySignature said:pam said:I can safely say that 99% of the times I've almost been killed in a car was due to some white-hat schmuck in a shitty Japanese car trying to do 100 through traffic on the highway or because some fucking idiot on their cell phone isn't watching the road. oh ya sorry bout that. Every time you leave Ralph's I spend all night wondering how you get home alive. thats why i walk. he lives 5 seconds further up the street from me. egad. |
____________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 3:19pm - RichHorror ""] Driving sober is for commies. |
_________________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 4:03pm - Swollen Donkey ""] shut it whore, if i wanted grammar lessons i'd beat em outta ya! |
_________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 4:56pm - sxealex ""] just put your tongue over the hole and make a blowing face... every time no matter what they say. eventually they will kick your ass and then you will be home free. |
___________________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 5:05pm - FuckIsMySignature ""] honestly, i dont know how i am to do anything without getting killed. |
_________________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 5:10pm - metal_church101 ""] :duffbeer::moe::duffbeer: |
_____________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 5:59pm - xanonymousx ""] i know how too... just don't drink and then when you get pulled over simple. |
_____________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 7:33pm - horror_tang ""] Swollen Donkey said:horror_tang said:This is not a joke. Allowing the government to dictate whether or not we can drink and drive is an infringement on our civil liberties. "But it's for or own good." Well, now you have to wear a seatbelt. Yes, statistically there has been shown to be a 50% intoxicant related causal rate of motor vehicle accident deaths (notice I did not say alcohol related). That means 50% are from sober drivers. When a driver dies in a car accident and alcohol and drugs are found in their system, it is reported as a drunk driving fatality. Was it the drugs or the alcohol? Who compiled the statistics? The truth is that the leading cause of motor vehicle accident deaths is driver distraction. Talking on a cell phone or eating breakfast on the way to work while driving is more likely to cause a motor vehicle fatality than someone driving drunk. The true number of deaths caused by drunk drivers is more comparable to deaths caused by drivers that fall asleep behind the wheel. your a fucking moron! Infringmens on our civil liberties? dude it's a law! Just shut up, no ones gonna buy this shit! What? I cannot hear anonymous faggots. |
_____________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 7:35pm - horror_tang ""] xanonymousx said:i know how too... just don't drink and then when you get pulled over simple. Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner. |
_____________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 7:37pm - horror_tang ""] Although, I can still tell you how to get out of a DUI when you know they have you dead to rights. It's legal and the cops cannot do a thing. |
__________________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 7:38pm - davefromthegrave ""] well, tell us then. |
________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 7:57pm - INFECT ""] ive passed a breathalyzer before, real easy just dont blow into the fuckin thing hahahaha it sounds stupid, but if you just barely blow into it it will register an error, just keep doing that and then when the pigs ask whats up tell them you have a chest cold and have poor lung capacity |
__________________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 9:07pm - thegreatspaldino ""] horror_tang said: The truth is that the leading cause of motor vehicle accident deaths is driver distraction. Talking on a cell phone or eating breakfast on the way to work while driving is more likely to cause a motor vehicle fatality than someone driving drunk. The true number of deaths caused by drunk drivers is more comparable to deaths caused by drivers that fall asleep behind the wheel. that has some merit but i have witnessed numerous drunk drivers that swerve violently onto the wrong side of the road and hit parked cars and all sorts of other shit. most notably i have witnessed someone do exactly that, swerve uncontroably back and forth onto the wrong side of the road and then nail a telephone pole... i witnessed this in my rear view mirror. are you going to tell me that getting tanked and driving (which i have no real problem with actually, you can ask numerous friends and acquaintances) is the same as eating a burger or snack wrap while driving? just because 90% of the people can do something, it doesnt mean that they all can. there have been actual tests that show most people become shittier drivers the more drunk they are. i WOULD classify that as driver distraction though. have you actually researched these statistics? 50% of fatal accidents are from intoxicated operators? i can toss around numbers that sound optimistic too... 79.4% of people that read my posts agree with me. see? its easy. im not trying to attack you or anything with this, im just saying that i dont really believe these are factual statistics you are referencing and that i dont agree with some of what you said. i DO believe that the blood alcohol limit should be a little higher, but they arent gonna change that. i can probably blow a high number on a breathalizer and not be anywhere near as drunk and incoherent as someone that blew a lower number and that is a smaller person. all in all... if you dont want to get a ticket or go to jail dont get obliterated before you drive. a lot of the times with any situation you find yourself in with a cop that pulled you over, they know before hand whether or not they are gonna ticket you/take you in and if they dont have that determined, dont give them a reason to. its about half and half your judgement and the cop's incentive. |
____________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 10:16pm - MikePile ""] horror_tang said:This is not a joke. Allowing the government to dictate whether or not we can drink and drive is an infringement on our civil liberties. "But it's for or own good." Well, now you have to wear a seatbelt. Yes, statistically there has been shown to be a 50% intoxicant related causal rate of motor vehicle accident deaths (notice I did not say alcohol related). That means 50% are from sober drivers. When a driver dies in a car accident and alcohol and drugs are found in their system, it is reported as a drunk driving fatality. Was it the drugs or the alcohol? Who compiled the statistics? while i don't think it should be legal to drink and drive, i DO think that i should be able to stick my hand out the window and discharge a firearm blindly into the street whenever i please. furthermore, |
____________________________________ [Dec 12,2007 10:18pm - MikePile ""] xanonymousx said:i know how too... just don't drink and then when you get pulled over simple. i'd much rather just drink and not get pulled over |
_________________________________ [Dec 13,2007 12:35am - NIGGER ""] WHY ELSE YOU HAVE A BITCH? HAND HER THE KEYS BITCH, DRIVE MY ASS HOME, I'M THREE MILES HIGH AND IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT, IMA PIMP YOUR ASS RIGHT HERE TO GET BUS FARE WORKS EVERY TIME JUST LOOK MEAN BLACK POWER! |
________________________________ [Dec 13,2007 1:42am - Andy. ""] NIGGER said:WHY ELSE YOU HAVE A BITCH? HAND HER THE KEYS BITCH, DRIVE MY ASS HOME, I'M THREE MILES HIGH AND IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT, IMA PIMP YOUR ASS RIGHT HERE TO GET BUS FARE WORKS EVERY TIME JUST LOOK MEAN BLACK POWER! Wow, I actually agree with this post. |
___________________________________ [Dec 13,2007 1:54am - MikePile ""] NIGGER said:WHY ELSE YOU HAVE A BITCH? HAND HER THE KEYS BITCH, DRIVE MY ASS HOME, I'M THREE MILES HIGH AND IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT, IMA PIMP YOUR ASS RIGHT HERE TO GET BUS FARE WORKS EVERY TIME JUST LOOK MEAN BLACK POWER! a villainous gangster, from the streets? |
______________________________________ [Dec 13,2007 11:13am - horror_tang ""] thegreatspaldino said: have you actually researched these statistics? 50% of fatal accidents are from intoxicated operators? i can toss around numbers that sound optimistic too... 79.4% of people that read my posts agree with me. Yes, I have researched these statistics. Now go research them for yourself and come back with your findings to contradict me. |
__________________________________________ [Dec 13,2007 12:53pm - Swollen Donkey ""] horror_tang said:Swollen Donkey said:horror_tang said:This is not a joke. Allowing the government to dictate whether or not we can drink and drive is an infringement on our civil liberties. "But it's for or own good." Well, now you have to wear a seatbelt. Yes, statistically there has been shown to be a 50% intoxicant related causal rate of motor vehicle accident deaths (notice I did not say alcohol related). That means 50% are from sober drivers. When a driver dies in a car accident and alcohol and drugs are found in their system, it is reported as a drunk driving fatality. Was it the drugs or the alcohol? Who compiled the statistics? The truth is that the leading cause of motor vehicle accident deaths is driver distraction. Talking on a cell phone or eating breakfast on the way to work while driving is more likely to cause a motor vehicle fatality than someone driving drunk. The true number of deaths caused by drunk drivers is more comparable to deaths caused by drivers that fall asleep behind the wheel. your a fucking moron! Infringmens on our civil liberties? dude it's a law! Just shut up, no ones gonna buy this shit! What? I cannot hear anonymous faggots. That's too bad, you could learn something, you bafoon. |
__________________________________ [Dec 13,2007 1:16pm - sinistas ""] People who don't understand the nature of RTTP shouldn't post. |
___________________________________________ [Dec 13,2007 1:26pm - FuckIsMySignature ""] sinistas said:People who don't understand the nature of RTTP shouldn't post. but then we wouldnt have so much fun bashing them. |
__________________________________ [Dec 13,2007 1:50pm - sinistas ""] That's a point I didn't take into consideration. |
_____________________________________ [Dec 13,2007 4:33pm - horror_tang ""] Swollen Donkey said:That's too bad, you could learn something, you bafoon. What? [img] |
__________________________________ [Dec 13,2007 4:37pm - pam nli ""] FuckIsMySignature said:sinistas said:People who don't understand the nature of RTTP shouldn't post. but then we wouldnt have so much fun bashing them. Seriously, after all what's a RTTP thread without someone calling me a whore for being smarter than they are? |
__________________________________________ [Dec 14,2007 11:49am - Swollen Donkey ""] pam nli said:FuckIsMySignature said:sinistas said:People who don't understand the nature of RTTP shouldn't post. but then we wouldnt have so much fun bashing them. Seriously, after all what's a RTTP thread without someone calling me a whore for being smarter than they are? whore! :whipper: |
_____________________________________ [Dec 14,2007 11:59am - RichHorror ""] horror_tang said:Swollen Donkey said:That's too bad, you could learn something, you bafoon. What? [img] [img] |
____________________________________ [Dec 14,2007 12:49pm - contagion ""] you should just tell us so we can all get drunk and drive home without worrying about a designated driver. oh, wait. nevermind. |