.:.:.:.:RTTP.Mobile:.:.:.:.
[<--back] [Home][Pics][News][Ads][Events][Forum][Band][Search]
full forum | bottom

Re-processed some pictures

[views:1336][posts:16]
 ______________________________________
[Dec 16,2007 5:24pm - the_reverend ""]
my Kodak SLR/n didn't like the old way that I processed the images so in dec 2006, I re-wrote what I did and I've been meaning to go back and re-do the images. I found a set today and redid them.
Dover Brick House (Dover, NH)
the second is the original. the first is the newly processed.

new process|original
[img][img]

new process | original
[img][img]

new process|original
[img][img]

new process|original
[img][img]

new process|original
[img][img]

new process|original
[img][img]

new process|original
[img][img]

new process|original
[img][img]

new process|original
[img][img]

new process|original
[img][img]

new process|original
[img][img]

new process|original
[img][img]

new process|original
[img][img]

new process|original
[img][img]

new process|original
[img][img]
 ___________________________________
[Dec 16,2007 5:54pm - contagion ""]
how about you just do it right the first time, asshole?
 ______________________________________
[Dec 16,2007 5:56pm - the_reverend ""]
if I were that smart... well.. I wouldn't come here!
 ______________________________________
[Dec 17,2007 3:18pm - the_reverend ""]
bump so alex can see I mades heem zo preddy.
 _________________________________
[Dec 17,2007 3:47pm - djdjdj  ""]
nice!
 _____________________________________
[Dec 17,2007 3:54pm - AUTOPSY_666 ""]
I don't see much of a difference!
 ______________________________________
[Dec 17,2007 3:59pm - the_reverend ""]
there was a lot more noise and diagonal lines are jagged z's in the originals.
 _____________________________________
[Dec 17,2007 4:14pm - anonymouse  ""]
The faces are much cleaner. Nice.
 ____________________________________
[Dec 17,2007 6:00pm - Kinslayer  ""]
I think the originals look better. The re-processed ones look kinda grainy in the faces...like you just used the sharpen or unshark-mask filter.
 __________________________________
[Dec 17,2007 6:34pm - bradmann ""]
TTOS never looked better.
 ______________________________________
[Dec 17,2007 6:53pm - the_reverend ""]
there is actually no sharpening or usm. I just rewrote my image processing program to go from using Java2D to the newer model that other image processing apps use called JAI. it seems the origina antialiasing filter made jaggies on the original diagonal lines. the new one doesn't. the old one also had more noise in the shadows. mostly because of the interpolation when I resized the images.
 ____________________________________
[Dec 17,2007 7:03pm - Kinslayer  ""]
I was actually looking at them exactly opposite! The originals look like thay had USM applied to them and the newer re-processed ones do look much smoother/softer/better.
My bad!
 ______________________________________
[Dec 17,2007 7:06pm - the_reverend ""]
that's what I was going to say. you get everything backwards.
 ____________________________________
[Dec 17,2007 7:34pm - Kinslayer  ""]
I know! I even have Kartageners syndrome so all my internal organs are reversed too! (seriosuly)
 __________________________________
[Dec 17,2007 7:47pm - cav nli  ""]
this thread really only makes me think about one thing...ttos needs to do a last show!!
 ______________________________________
[Dec 18,2007 8:58am - the_reverend ""]
there is actually no sharpening or usm. I just rewrote my image processing program to go from using Java2D to the newer model that other image processing apps use called JAI. it seems the origina antialiasing filter made jaggies on the original diagonal lines. the new one doesn't. the old one also had more noise in the shadows. mostly because of the interpolation when I resized the images.
 ______________________________________
[Dec 18,2007 8:59am - the_reverend ""]
bump so alex can see I mades heem zo preddy.


Reply
[login ]
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
message

top [Vers. 0.12][ 0.017 secs/8 queries][refresh][