.:.:.:.:RTTP.Mobile:.:.:.:.
[<--back] [Home][Pics][News][Ads][Events][Forum][Band][Search]
full forum | bottom

Rev and other photogs

[views:2669][posts:20]
 ______________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 7:37am - quintessence ""]
What lenses do you find you use the most for shows? Just wondering.
 ______________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 7:40am - the_reverend ""]
17-55mm f/2.8 dx
24-70mm f/2.8 fx
 __________________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 7:48am - DaveFromTheGrave ""]
12-24 mm f4 dx
that's my favorite one.
 ______________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 8:07am - the_reverend ""]
that is a dx lens.
I want the 14-24 f/2.8, but am looking around for a 20-60 f/2.8 fx lens
 __________________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 8:27am - DaveFromTheGrave ""]
i want the 14-24 too, but I can't afford it.
 __________________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 8:30am - DaveFromTheGrave ""]
wait, 20-60? they make one of those?
 ______________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 8:56am - the_reverend ""]
someone said that they did, but I haven't seen one yet. it might be a sigma or something.
 ______________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 9:36am - quintessence ""]

the_reverend said:17-55mm f/2.8 dx
24-70mm f/2.8 fx



I would love to pick up either of those. I need more money. :(

I need to replace my all around lens. Thinking of a Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC

I cant afford to spend more than 350 really. You rich bastards.
 ______________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 9:39am - the_reverend ""]
save up. don't buy just another shitty lens. 70mm @ f/4.5 is useless.
 ____________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 9:54am - porphyria  ""]

the_reverend said:17-55mm f/2.8 dx
24-70mm f/2.8 fx

& my gfs canon 70-200 f2.8 IS, but I pretend I don't shoot canon too.



:spineyes:
 ______________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 9:59am - quintessence ""]
True.... A 24-70mm f/2.8 isnt that far away really. This is what happens when I get bored at work. I should hide my credit cards.
 _____________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 10:02am - porphyria  ""]

quintessence said:True.... A 24-70mm f/2.8 isnt that far away really. This is what happens when I get bored at work. I should hide my credit cards.


you only live once, just buy it. you can always sell good lenses for nearly the same price you paid for it years later.
 _______________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 10:17am - quintessence ""]
Funny I just stumbled on one of Revs review of the Sigma 24 - 70 I might get at dpreview.com
 _______________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 10:42am - the_reverend ""]
that was the $350 version one lens. the new one is a DC lens and does macro. that is also on a full frame camera so 24mm on it is like 17mm on your camera.
The version 1 of the 17-35mm sigma blew, but I heard good things about the version 2.
I really suggest never getting any variable aperture lenses (except the 70-300)
 _______________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 10:43am - the_reverend ""]
oh and tom, I don't need canon anymore. I have a D3. haven't touched her canon's since.
 _______________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 11:35am - quintessence ""]
Sigma has some nice glass.

Whats your impression of the SIGMA 18-50MM F2.8 EX DC ?

 _______________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 11:59am - the_reverend ""]
people speak rather highly of it. I would probably suggest that to you over the 24-70mm on a dx camera.
 _____________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 12:06pm - porphyria  ""]
[img]
[img]
 _______________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 12:49pm - quintessence ""]
RAWR! canon vs nikon! who cares!
 _____________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 12:57pm - porphyria  ""]
JUST A JOKE. chill.
 _______________________________________
[Feb 25,2008 12:59pm - quintessence ""]
I'll admit. I laughed


Reply
[login ]
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
message

top [Vers. 0.12][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][refresh][