.:.:.:.:RTTP.Mobile:.:.:.:.
[<--back] [Home][Pics][News][Ads][Events][Forum][Band][Search]
full forum | bottom

Lynching violates copyright

[views:1657][posts:0]
 _________________________________________
[Apr 5,2008 12:46pm - Conservationist ""]
All Bobby Wayne Baxter wanted to do was lynch the lying, thieving, illegitimate offspring of a not very nice woman who he says raped his sister. Instead, he's got the NAACP, ACLU, and KKK up in arms about his actions.

"That boy done bad to Suzanne," Baxter spat. "She says no, he goes ahead. So me and the boys were going to take care of it country justice. We got him, we beat him up real bad, and we had him standing in the back of the pickup truck with a noose around his neck going to the tree above, and suddenly, we're drowning in lawyers."

According to NAACP general counsel Howard P. Shermington, the noose is a symbol of white oppression of blacks exclusively, and is covered under several copyrights granted to the NAACP and other black organizations. "Just because the victim, in this case a person of white color, is lynched without intent to defame the symbol owned by black people, it does not mean that copyright law is abrogated. The noose, formerly a symbol of oppression and racism, is now owned by those who were once subjected to it by those who owned them."

Shermington and the NAACP as well as other black organizations are asking for $7.2 million in punitive and actual damages.

Staring at a summons, Baxter puzzled through the situation. "This says we owe them money for infringing copyright. I figured the Sheriff might be upset with us for killing this guy, even though he is a rapist of my sister, but we haven't heard from him at all. Just more lawyers, and faxes. I have no idea how I'm gonna pay this."

http://www.corrupt.org/articles/satire/bre..._lynching_violates_ethnic_copyright


Reply
[login ]
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
message

top [Vers. 0.12][ 0.006 secs/8 queries][refresh][