.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Niccolai.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Niccolai:768450"][QUOTE="Joshtruction:768432"][QUOTE="Blue:768419"][QUOTE="ArrowHeadNLI:768411"]I guess Fender actually DID make a few improvements, as much as I hate to admit it.[/QUOTE] only reason they have duncans in the dk2s now is because ltd and schecter had been pwning the midrange market for years, and they figured if they wanted any sales they should finally step up to bat with a decently loaded midrange offering.[/QUOTE] True that. They also have a contract with grover and a lot of them typical jackson tuners are really grovers. They also stepped up in the wiring/potentiometer department too.[/QUOTE] but not the neck construction options :( in the 600 dollar range Jackson's guitars have HZs (edit, they just updated a couple guitars in the MG line to actives), liscensed grover tuners, liscensed floyds, and bolt on necks. for the same money you'll get an LTD with OFR, grovers, active EMGs and neck through construction. Jackson is throwing the middle market out the window. I've heard their USA line has been declining over the last couple years too. It's a shame because some of the best guitars ever were 80s and 90s jacksons.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][