.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to pesk.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="pesk:799826"]sxealex: ok, but the wording is also weird to me.. the simple inclusion of the word "watching". we all know children don't listen to the radio anymore (haha!). and going back to my previous statement, at the very least the numerous news shows on major broadcast networks often include details that would be considered profane for the sake of children. i remember as a child my parents sometimes telling me to cover my ears or leave the room if a particularly graphic piece of news came on the air. i mean look at shows like TMZ or Entertainment Tonight... they cover all kinds of what could be considered "profane" content. i feel that anyone could show up at the studio and say "im filing a complaint against so and so for this and that!!" again, not trying to discredit the possible seriousness of this or start a fight. as a friend of foghorn, im simply trying to figure out anyway that this complaint could actually have credibility [B]LONG LIVE FOGHORN![/B] edit: the reverend: in that case, what is your more direct opinon about the validity of this complaint? im hoping that foghorn doesn't even need a lawyer at this point! i feel that this is a totally baseless complaint that someone felt the need to deliver in person and just cause a huge muck-up, but i don't know the full details either so who knows. my fingers are still crossed! [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][