.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to MikeofDecrepitude.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="MikeofDecrepitude:811662"]Exactly, that's why I said it's all objective, and what's Doom to me might not be to someone else. Type O is a good example. I'd personally classify "Slow, Deep, and Hard" as punk/doom album (doom of the sabbath variety). I know a lot of people denounce Type O as a doom band, and they tend to get lumped in with the gothic genre. Type O is diverse, they've mixed (classic)doom, punk, and even pop together. And like I said, there's quality and garbage in all genres; and people should be able to discuss and debate if they'd like, without anyone getting weepy about shit.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][