9/11 was Clinton's fault[views:2560][posts:18]______________________________________________ [Sep 26,2008 6:51pm - BobNOMAAMRooney nli ""] j/k everyone knows Jews did 9/11 [img] [img] |
| _______________________________ [Sep 27,2008 3:01pm - Seth ""] Even if this was true for you stupid people. You did not care under Clinton for the good economy and money we had in our pockets. |
| _____________________________________ [Sep 27,2008 3:07pm - sacreligion ""] haven't you heard? all the problems facing this country are the delayed result of clinton's policies. who cares that the economy was the best it ever was and then one year after bush hit office everything went down the shitter. it was all clinton's fault! i thought everyone knew that! not really though. |
| _________________________________________ [Sep 27,2008 5:06pm - Conservationist ""] [img] |
| _________________________________________ [Sep 27,2008 5:07pm - Conservationist ""] sacreligion said:who cares that the economy was the best it ever was and then one year after bush hit office everything went down the shitter. Yeah, cause if you build a castle made of sand in the 1990s, it collapses in the 00s. DrKoop.com, worth $200 million? O RLY? |
| _________________________________________ [Sep 27,2008 5:08pm - Conservationist ""] http://www.gnaa.us/pr.phtml?troll=jews-wtc |
| _____________________________________ [Sep 28,2008 2:11am - sacreligion ""] Conservationist said:Yeah, cause if you build a castle made of sand in the 1990s, it collapses in the 00s. DrKoop.com, worth $200 million? O RLY? so you're saying because the internet became popular during clinton's time that the failed web enterprises are his fault? |
| _________________________________________ [Sep 28,2008 5:44am - Conservationist ""] sacreligion said: Conservationist said:Yeah, cause if you build a castle made of sand in the 1990s, it collapses in the 00s. DrKoop.com, worth $200 million? O RLY? so you're saying because the internet became popular during clinton's time that the failed web enterprises are his fault? No, I'm saying that he allowed completely stupid business plans to be overvalued, and encouraged that overvaluation, which required a re-adjustment through the 00s. |
| _____________________________________ [Sep 28,2008 6:08am - sacreligion ""] but that implies that he should be overseeing every business decision people make. the internet was a growing medium so naturally businesses would pop u p to take advantage of this unexplored fincancial terrain, and naturally some of these people wouldn't be suited for the job. what did clinton do to really promote the overvaluation? wouldn't you say it was more the media and increasingly easier access to the internet that promoted it? |
| _________________________________________ [Sep 28,2008 6:25am - Conservationist ""] sacreligion said:but that implies that he should be overseeing every business decision people make. LOL, no it doesn't. It implies that businesses that run radically -- billions of dollars -- out of control should be watched. No different than keeping an eye on airlines or Ma Bell. |
| _____________________________________ [Sep 28,2008 6:31am - sacreligion ""] or businesses like halliburton and jp morgan & chase who are gaining billions of dollars by taking advantage of bullshit decisions made by a bullshit president and the regime of people he appointed. the way to fix a debt problem isn't to borrow more money, especially when by borrow they mean "take from the american people" |
| _________________________________________ [Sep 28,2008 6:42am - Conservationist ""] sacreligion said:or businesses like halliburton and jp morgan & chase who are gaining billions of dollars by taking advantage of bullshit decisions made by a bullshit president and the regime of people he appointed. the way to fix a debt problem isn't to borrow more money, especially when by borrow they mean "take from the american people" Haliburton, no comment. The bailout is actually a good idea, I think. It allows the US gov't to suddenly own a lot of home loans for about 30 cents on the dollar, preventing a much worse financial catastrophe. And as you saw, that catastrophe was brought on by ill-thought democratic policies under Clinton ;) |
| _____________________________________ [Sep 28,2008 6:45am - sacreligion ""] all this plan is going to do is consolidate financial power in our "free market" system. when the values of wall st. companies and banks fail, the overhead companies can buy them out for, like you said, 30 cents on the dollar. also, what good does the government owning home loans do for us? and does this money go to the government or the fed reserve? they are the ones that proposed this bailout, correct? |
| _____________________________________ [Sep 28,2008 6:46am - sacreligion ""] Mayer Amschel Rothschild - "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws." |
| _________________________________________ [Sep 28,2008 9:46am - Conservationist ""] sacreligion said:all this plan is going to do is consolidate financial power in our "free market" system. when the values of wall st. companies and banks fail, the overhead companies can buy them out for, like you said, 30 cents on the dollar. also, what good does the government owning home loans do for us? and does this money go to the government or the fed reserve? they are the ones that proposed this bailout, correct? It's going to mean that the market does not have to equalize the difference in value a true bankruptcy would create. Also, the loans will now be administered, idiots kicked out and houses put back on the market. Otherwise, chaos might have delayed that indefinitely. |
| _____________________________________ [Sep 28,2008 4:56pm - sacreligion ""] but does that really "bail out" wall st. and smaller, independent banks? |
| __________________________________________ [Sep 28,2008 10:24pm - ctB0rderpatrol ""] Seth said:Even if this was true for you stupid people. You did not care under Clinton for the good economy and money we had in our pockets. at the expense of our manufacturing base and sovereignty |
| _____________________________________ [Sep 29,2008 2:55am - sacreligion ""] the downfall of the production industry was the lack of uniform wage, labor, and health care systems in the world. the fact that china, mexico, etc. were willing to produce the same product for cheaper costs is only a means of taking advantage of free market capitalism on a global scale. in a sense, it was forcing the ruthless business (lack of) ethics of the american financial system. also, how was any of our sovereignty in jeopardy before the patriot act? pre-emptive strikes? are you fucking kidding me? |
| _____________________________________ [Sep 29,2008 2:55am - sacreligion ""] *double post* |