.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ouchdrummer.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ouchdrummer:821332"][QUOTE="Conservationist:821325"][QUOTE="ouchdrummer:821324"][QUOTE="Conservationist:821316"][QUOTE="ouchdrummer:821311"]Lets not try to compare liberals with conservatives EVERY time a conservative is bashed ok? She's god damn batshit, and her "beliefs" scare the hell outta me because they could influence very big, very serious policy.[/QUOTE] I think it's important to put them in context. Obama has some crazy beliefs -- equally crazy -- that scare the shit out of me. What's worse than no solution? A false solution.[/QUOTE] Whats with the deflection? Instead of agreeing that her beliefs are crazy and she's scary (which you HAVE to believe) you try to in turn put down obama. (who i don't like) dude, i was just saying dont defend the bitch. Thats it, no ones pushing obama on you in this thread, why defend this wacko, or try to make it look like it's not a problem because both sides have issues?[/QUOTE] Technically, it's not a deflection. It's an argument for a wider inclusion. I agreed with one poster that SCIENCE is important. However, at that point, the argument has expanded to include all abuses of SCIENCE. I have not actually defended Palin on this, because (a) I don't agree with Creationism in the form she endorses it (b) I think she's pandering to an audience that has proven intractable on this issue, so it's an insoluble problem. My advice is to look at actual policy questions. If we're going to include one candidate as anti-Science, we should keep the debate open about both sides and their failures in Science, which is a way of pointing out a *lack of exclusivity* to the charge in question, therefore decreasing its relevance.[/QUOTE] see, the big mis-communication here is that we weren't talking about who the better candidate/vp would be, we were just saying she's nuts.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][