Who else is writing in Ron Paul on the ballot?[views:5389][posts:77]__________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 8:30pm - MASlayer ""] anyone? |
| _________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 8:39pm - archaeon ""] nope, no one else. |
| ___________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 8:40pm - porphyria ""] Ron Paul is cool n' all but why even vote at all if you're just going to write someone in? |
| ________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 8:53pm - sxealex ""] agreed...campaigns should be illegal |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 8:54pm - the_reverend ""] yeah. you liive in mass why vote? plus, ron paul would vote for rape victims in north dakota to be forced by the state to keep the baby. fuck him. vote kucinich if you are writing in anything. all the nut bag with pro-abortion |
| __________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 8:55pm - MASlayer ""] porphyria said:Ron Paul is cool n' all but why even vote at all if you're just going to write someone in? to actually support someone who I feels is best for the job...what's wrong with that? Rather cast a vote for him than going with a lesser of 2 evils... |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 8:56pm - the_reverend ""] you live in mass. you only have one evil to vote for. |
| ________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 8:57pm - sxealex ""] this is why there should be finalists like a tournament |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 10:00pm - porphyria ""] MASlayer said: to actually support someone who I feels is best for the job...what's wrong with that? Rather cast a vote for him than going with a lesser of 2 evils... With Sarah Palin in the mix on top of McCain being Bush Lite, the choice is pretty damn simple in my opinion regardless if you still don't like Obama all that much. |
| ______________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 10:04pm - the_reverend ""] honestly, I want a 100% electoral tie. and then the house votes in obama and the senate is an exact tie with liberman going for palin (even though mccain tossed that dude under the bus) and dick cheney casts the deciding vote for palin as vp. that would be the best shitstorm ever! it just would suck when someone mlk's obama and palin is the presidentwhore |
| ________________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 10:32pm - deathchickNLI ""] MASlayer said:anyone? I'm considering writing in Ron Paul. That or voting 3rd party. I'm convinced McCain and Obama are corporate puppets. |
| _______________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 10:41pm - y_ddraig_goch ""] deathchickNLI said: MASlayer said:anyone? I'm considering writing in Ron Paul. That or voting 3rd party. I'm convinced McCain and Obama are corporate puppets. man, ron paul was a republican...you can't vote for him. there's only one nomination for each party and he's not runningg as a third party because he has morals and is loyal to his party |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 10:44pm - porphyria ""] deathchickNLI said: I'm convinced McCain and Obama are corporate puppets. I'll take the puppet that is different from Bush, highly educated, speaks coherently, has a better tax plan, and only has 1 house/1 car. |
| ________________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 11:04pm - deathchickNLI ""] The election is most likely rigged anyway. There is plenty of evidence out there that the Diebold machines are easily hackable and faulty. bennyhillifier |
| ________________________________________ [Oct 1,2008 11:05pm - deathchickNLI ""] any one else see "Hacking Democracy?" |
| _________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 12:44am - Conservationist ""] MASlayer said:anyone? M3 700 |
| _____________________________ [Oct 2,2008 7:47am - Yeti ""] i'm going to write in "Shao Kahn". he does a fine job with Outworld. |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 8:12am - the_reverend ""] cool, I didn't know that deathchick hated the fact that women have the right to choose to get an abortion (even when raped). |
| ________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 8:49am - Conservationist ""] Abortions rock. The entire debate over the issue is stupid, since it immoblizes the right as they try to pander to the few and fanatical. It's kind of like the left and race. http://www.news-medical.net/?id=9530 LOL |
| _______________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 8:58am - deathchickNLI ""] the_reverend said:cool, I didn't know that deathchick hated the fact that women have the right to choose to get an abortion (even when raped). I love abortions. I've already had 3. |
| ________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 9:05am - Conservationist ""] Were they tasty? How did you cook them? |
| _______________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 9:09am - deathchickNLI ""] fetus dumplings, yum. |
| _______________________________ [Oct 2,2008 9:12am - xmikex ""] My ballot will say WE WANT CHILLY WILLY. Followed by a gigantic meatball stain. /election |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 9:17am - orgymf@work ""] the_reverend said:yeah. you liive in mass why vote? plus, ron paul would vote for rape victims in north dakota to be forced by the state to keep the baby. fuck him. vote kucinich if you are writing in anything. all the nut bag with pro-abortion incorrect. Ron Paul is against abortion....but he also against federal government intefering in our personal lives |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 9:20am - orgymf@work ""] y_ddraig_goch said: deathchickNLI said: MASlayer said:anyone? I'm considering writing in Ron Paul. That or voting 3rd party. I'm convinced McCain and Obama are corporate puppets. man, ron paul was a republican...you can't vote for him. there's only one nomination for each party and he's not runningg as a third party because he has morals and is loyal to his party that does not matter!!!!!!!! if enough people write him in a he wins, just because he didn't get the nomination, doesn't mean he can't be a republican in office..... of course he could always jump on the Cynthia Mckinney bandwagon and call himself a member of the "Constitutionalist" party |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 9:20am - orgymf@work ""] if enough people write him in AND he wins, that was....god damn i suck |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 9:22am - orgymf@work ""] anyway....to answer the question of the thread, yes, i will write in Ron Paul, and anyone who doesn't is contributing to the already staggering number of people who mindlessly flocking like sheep to vote for a fossil, with an inexperienced running mate, or an inexperienced candiate, with an idiot running mate. fuck obama fuck biden' fuck mccain fuck palin |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 9:25am - Josh_Martin ""] orgymf@work said: the_reverend said:yeah. you liive in mass why vote? plus, ron paul would vote for rape victims in north dakota to be forced by the state to keep the baby. fuck him. vote kucinich if you are writing in anything. all the nut bag with pro-abortion incorrect. Ron Paul is against abortion....but he also against federal government intefering in our personal lives Holy oxymoron, buttman. |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 9:28am - orgymf@work ""] no josh, it's not an oxymoron, what i meant by that is, it is against his personal beliefs, but he does not support laws against it. he does not support any laws that infringe upon our personal lives. |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 9:31am - the_reverend ""] how many times will people be idiots about the abortion debate. Ron paul will put in place judges that will overturn rowe v wade. that will cause the states and or counties to once again pass their own laws. since morals are geographically centralized, there will be huge collection of states (where the stupid people that you want to have abortions live). then 16 year old girls will have to travel 400+ miles across state lines to get to abortions. oh yeah, crossing state lines or helping someone cross state lines for an abortion would also be illegal. so go ahead, vote for a world full of unaborted incest and rape babies. |
| __________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 9:38am - MikeofDecrepitude ""] the_reverend said:yeah. you liive in mass why vote? plus, ron paul would vote for rape victims in north dakota to be forced by the state to keep the baby. fuck him. vote kucinich if you are writing in anything. all the nut bag with pro-abortion I'd vote for Kucinich if he wasn't pro gun control, so fuck ron paul? fuck him too. |
| __________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 9:40am - MikeofDecrepitude ""] Josh_Martin said: orgymf@work said: the_reverend said:yeah. you liive in mass why vote? plus, ron paul would vote for rape victims in north dakota to be forced by the state to keep the baby. fuck him. vote kucinich if you are writing in anything. all the nut bag with pro-abortion incorrect. Ron Paul is against abortion....but he also against federal government intefering in our personal lives Holy oxymoron, buttman. He has his own set of morals which are well known, yet he abides by the constitution as the law of the land. No flip-flopping there. |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 9:43am - Josh_Martin ""] the_reverend said:how many times will people be idiots about the abortion debate. Ron paul will put in place judges that will overturn rowe v wade. that will cause the states and or counties to once again pass their own laws. since morals are geographically centralized, there will be huge collection of states (where the stupid people that you want to have abortions live). then 16 year old girls will have to travel 400+ miles across state lines to get to abortions. oh yeah, crossing state lines or helping someone cross state lines for an abortion would also be illegal. so go ahead, vote for a world full of unaborted incest and rape babies. Thank you. He may be against the Feds interfering, but he has no problem with state govt telling broads what to do with their cunts. |
| __________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 9:55am - MikeofDecrepitude ""] Yeah, because we're involved in a quagmire in Iraq, the economy is being destroyed by our own government, and we have a candidate like Barack Obama who supports the Global Poverty Act which would take billions of taxpayers money and ship it overseas in droves to 3rd world nations. Of course the goal wouldn't even be to teach them trades so that they can support themselves, but to create giant welfare states. He didn't vote for the war yet he's all for using taxpayers money to rebuild foreign nations like Iraq? Abortion is the last thing on my mind right now. |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:17am - porphyria ""] There's no point in wasting your time voting if you're just going to write someone in. Might as well write in Santa. |
| ______________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:19am - the_reverend ""] whoah.. I didn't realize santa was still running |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:26am - Josh_Martin ""] MikeofDecrepitude said:Yeah, because we're involved in a quagmire in Iraq, the economy is being destroyed by our own government, and we have a candidate like Barack Obama who supports the Global Poverty Act which would take billions of taxpayers money and ship it overseas in droves to 3rd world nations. Of course the goal wouldn't even be to teach them trades so that they can support themselves, but to create giant welfare states. He didn't vote for the war yet he's all for using taxpayers money to rebuild foreign nations like Iraq? Abortion is the last thing on my mind right now. That's a much better way to stop terrorism than our idiotic invasion of Iraq. People become terrorists because they are fucking pissed off. If the ragheads had all the creature comforts and brain-deadening forms of entertainment that we have, they wouldn't be flying planes into buildings and blowing up shit. Better to spend the money on that than on making their lives worse therefore creating more terrorists. |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:26am - Josh_Martin ""] Rev, how come when I first get work my posts come out fine and then after a few hours this triple shit starts? This is weird. |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:26am - Josh_Martin ""] . |
| _________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:27am - Conservationist ""] the_reverend said:that will cause the states and or counties to once again pass their own laws. That is exactly what I want. America needs to separate into liberal and conservative spheres anyway; it's inevitable. I think having states regulate many things, like abortion and drug legalization, lets citizens have the best of both worlds -- you can move someplace for its policies, and others don't have to subsidize it if it fails. There will be conservative states where abortion is not illegal. |
| _________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:27am - Conservationist ""] MikeofDecrepitude said:Yeah, because we're involved in a quagmire in Iraq, the economy is being destroyed by our own government, and we have a candidate like Barack Obama who supports the Global Poverty Act which would take billions of taxpayers money and ship it overseas in droves to 3rd world nations. We've done this for years with foreign aid, and all it does is make others hate us, apparently. |
| _________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:28am - Conservationist ""] Josh_Martin said:Better to spend the money on that than on making their lives worse therefore creating more terrorists. Yeah, it can't be because they honestly disagree with us and aren't whores to convenience, can it? |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:30am - porphyria ""] the_reverend said:whoah.. I didn't realize santa was still running Santa is always running. |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:30am - Josh_Martin ""] Conservationist said: Josh_Martin said:Better to spend the money on that than on making their lives worse therefore creating more terrorists. Yeah, it can't be because they honestly disagree with us and aren't whores to convenience, can it? For the current generation, yeah probably. I'm thinking more of future generations. People who didn't grow up hating us. Give the kids a taste of good ol' american teen rebellion. |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:30am - Josh_Martin ""] . |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:30am - Josh_Martin ""] . |
| ________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:37am - monster_island ""] the_reverend said:whoah.. I didn't realize santa was still running just ask Palin where Santa rears his head first ... Alaska silly |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:40am - Josh_Martin ""] I'm actually voting for the Colbert/Spiderman ticket. |
| ______________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:43am - orgymf@work ""] MikeofDecrepitude said:Yeah, because we're involved in a quagmire in Iraq, the economy is being destroyed by our own government, and we have a candidate like Barack Obama who supports the Global Poverty Act which would take billions of taxpayers money and ship it overseas in droves to 3rd world nations. Of course the goal wouldn't even be to teach them trades so that they can support themselves, but to create giant welfare states. He didn't vote for the war yet he's all for using taxpayers money to rebuild foreign nations like Iraq? Abortion is the last thing on my mind right now. \ WELL SAID SIR backed |
| ___________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:45am - Mikeofdecrepitude ""] Josh_Martin said: MikeofDecrepitude said:Yeah, because we're involved in a quagmire in Iraq, the economy is being destroyed by our own government, and we have a candidate like Barack Obama who supports the Global Poverty Act which would take billions of taxpayers money and ship it overseas in droves to 3rd world nations. Of course the goal wouldn't even be to teach them trades so that they can support themselves, but to create giant welfare states. He didn't vote for the war yet he's all for using taxpayers money to rebuild foreign nations like Iraq? Abortion is the last thing on my mind right now. That's a much better way to stop terrorism than our idiotic invasion of Iraq. People become terrorists because they are fucking pissed off. If the ragheads had all the creature comforts and brain-deadening forms of entertainment that we have, they wouldn't be flying planes into buildings and blowing up shit. Better to spend the money on that than on making their lives worse therefore creating more terrorists. It's our constant meddling in other's affairs and exploitations of foreign nations that breeds the animosity against the west. I can't agree with this socialist idea of giving third world nations our money so that they don't "hate" us. They just want to funnel the money in and not actually create any social programs that would teach them trades for their overall benefit. Give a man a fish and he eats for a day; teach a man to fish and he eats for a lifetime. |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:49am - porphyria ""] ANYTHING Obama/Biden will do is better than what McCain/Palin will. |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:51am - deathchick ""] MikeofDecrepitude said:Yeah, because we're involved in a quagmire in Iraq, the economy is being destroyed by our own government, and we have a candidate like Barack Obama who supports the Global Poverty Act which would take billions of taxpayers money and ship it overseas in droves to 3rd world nations. Of course the goal wouldn't even be to teach them trades so that they can support themselves, but to create giant welfare states. He didn't vote for the war yet he's all for using taxpayers money to rebuild foreign nations like Iraq? Abortion is the last thing on my mind right now. My thoughts exactly. |
| ___________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:52am - Mikeofdecrepitude ""] They're both corporate candidates who are two sides of the same coin. I see no difference between both because none of them have our best interests at hand. |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:55am - Josh_Martin ""] Mikeofdecrepitude said: Josh_Martin said: MikeofDecrepitude said:Yeah, because we're involved in a quagmire in Iraq, the economy is being destroyed by our own government, and we have a candidate like Barack Obama who supports the Global Poverty Act which would take billions of taxpayers money and ship it overseas in droves to 3rd world nations. Of course the goal wouldn't even be to teach them trades so that they can support themselves, but to create giant welfare states. He didn't vote for the war yet he's all for using taxpayers money to rebuild foreign nations like Iraq? Abortion is the last thing on my mind right now. That's a much better way to stop terrorism than our idiotic invasion of Iraq. People become terrorists because they are fucking pissed off. If the ragheads had all the creature comforts and brain-deadening forms of entertainment that we have, they wouldn't be flying planes into buildings and blowing up shit. Better to spend the money on that than on making their lives worse therefore creating more terrorists. It's our constant meddling in other's affairs and exploitations of foreign nations that breeds the animosity against the west. I can't agree with this socialist idea of giving third world nations our money so that they don't "hate" us. They just want to funnel the money in and not actually create any social programs that would teach them trades for their overall benefit. Give a man a fish and he eats for a day; teach a man to fish and he eats for a lifetime. Look, i don't necessarily support it either, but the money is going over there regardless of who's in charge. Might as well do something better with it then we are now. And like anus.com said, we've been sending billions in foreign aid for years. This is nothing new. |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:55am - Josh_Martin ""] . |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:55am - Josh_Martin ""] . |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 10:58am - deathchick ""] Josh_Martin said: Mikeofdecrepitude said: Josh_Martin said: MikeofDecrepitude said:Yeah, because we're involved in a quagmire in Iraq, the economy is being destroyed by our own government, and we have a candidate like Barack Obama who supports the Global Poverty Act which would take billions of taxpayers money and ship it overseas in droves to 3rd world nations. Of course the goal wouldn't even be to teach them trades so that they can support themselves, but to create giant welfare states. He didn't vote for the war yet he's all for using taxpayers money to rebuild foreign nations like Iraq? Abortion is the last thing on my mind right now. That's a much better way to stop terrorism than our idiotic invasion of Iraq. People become terrorists because they are fucking pissed off. If the ragheads had all the creature comforts and brain-deadening forms of entertainment that we have, they wouldn't be flying planes into buildings and blowing up shit. Better to spend the money on that than on making their lives worse therefore creating more terrorists. It's our constant meddling in other's affairs and exploitations of foreign nations that breeds the animosity against the west. I can't agree with this socialist idea of giving third world nations our money so that they don't "hate" us. They just want to funnel the money in and not actually create any social programs that would teach them trades for their overall benefit. Give a man a fish and he eats for a day; teach a man to fish and he eats for a lifetime. Look, i don't necessarily support it either, but the money is going over there regardless of who's in charge. Might as well do something better with it then we are now. And like anus.com said, we've been sending billions in foreign aid for years. This is nothing new. Maybe it's time for change? We are billions of dollars in debt, the value of our dollar is plummeting, and our economy is collapsing. How about we keep our own money. |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 11:04am - Josh_Martin ""] If you really think Ron Paul in the White House would change any of that, (really rude comment removed because I don't feel like being an asshole today) |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 11:04am - Josh_Martin ""] . |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 11:04am - Josh_Martin ""] . |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 11:04am - deathchick ""] But let's get back on topic, ABORTIONS FUCKING RULE! I'm saving up for my next one. Rape fetus tastes best! |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 11:07am - Josh_Martin ""] deathchick said:But let's get back on topic, ABORTIONS FUCKING RULE! I'm saving up for my next one. Rape fetus tastes best! Now that I can get behind. Abortions and Drugs rule. Getting an abortion while you're on drugs is the rulingest. Are you allowed to take the fetus home with you? |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 11:07am - Josh_Martin ""] . |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 11:07am - Josh_Martin ""] . |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 11:08am - deathchick ""] Josh_Martin said:If you really think Ron Paul in the White House would change any of that, (really rude comment removed because I don't feel like being an asshole today) I really do, although I'm not so delusional to think it's going to happen this election. I think he would be best for the job. |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 11:09am - deathchick ""] Josh_Martin said: deathchick said:But let's get back on topic, ABORTIONS FUCKING RULE! I'm saving up for my next one. Rape fetus tastes best! Now that I can get behind. Abortions and Drugs rule. Getting an abortion while you're on drugs is the rulingest. Are you allowed to take the fetus home with you? You are. But the best way is by doing it at home. Coat hanger styling. |
| __________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 11:58am - darkwor ""] MikeofDecrepitude said:Yeah, because we're involved in a quagmire in Iraq, the economy is being destroyed by our own government, and we have a candidate like Barack Obama who supports the Global Poverty Act which would take billions of taxpayers money and ship it overseas in droves to 3rd world nations. Of course the goal wouldn't even be to teach them trades so that they can support themselves, but to create giant welfare states. He didn't vote for the war yet he's all for using taxpayers money to rebuild foreign nations like Iraq? Abortion is the last thing on my mind right now. Good point, just wanted to chime in that while I don't support heaps of foreign aid (or much of any for that matter) most of that money goes directly to schools and public services, creating trades and educated people in the process. And at this point, if the government doesn't rebuild Iraq, that means more enemies for us. It'd be interesting to see what happens if we let the middle east manage itself, abandon all our military bases and aid projects. That includes the rooting out the neocon zionists in this government and cutting ties with Israel (yea I said it) |
| ________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 1:10pm - Conservationist ""] Josh_Martin said:If you really think Ron Paul in the White House would change any of that, (really rude comment removed because I don't feel like being an asshole today) Having a third party candidate might provide more change than we think. Right now it's real cozy in Washington -- two big parties, lobbyists invest in them, everything moves along. Having a firebrand, either Paul or Kucinich, in the white house might cause some shakeup of that. I think the first myth we need to break down is that average people fit into either liberal or conservative camps "neatly." |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 1:14pm - Josh_Martin ""] Paul is a republican, kucinich is a democrat. excuse me if Im cynical. |
| ________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 1:16pm - Conservationist ""] I don't blame anyone for being cynical. I think that's important is disruption of business as usual, and people who are more committed to ideology than convenience, but not so committed they become dogmatic, Soviet-types (something both Obama and the Neocons had in common: they want to bring glorious democracy to the world!). Having a third party candidate, especially one who says "I'm doing this because it's both right AND practical," would go a long way toward reforming American politics. That and suppress the votes of anyone under 120 IQ points ;) |
| _____________________________ [Oct 2,2008 1:19pm - Yeti ""] "Your guilty conscience may force you to vote Democratic, but deep down inside you secretly long for a cold-hearted Republican to lower taxes, brutalize criminals, and rule you like a king. That's why I did this: to protect you from yourselves. Now if you'll excuse me, I have a city to run." |
| _______________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 1:29pm - monster_island ""] i love the right vs left sign in this endorsement bennyhillifier |
| _______________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 1:32pm - monster_island ""] [img] |
| __________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 2:20pm - FuckIsMySignature ""] thats remarkable |
| ______________________________ [Oct 2,2008 2:47pm - sigh ""] I hope in the future our elections are determined by a fight to the death and the winner gets and american flag shoved up his/her ass. |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 3:20pm - the_reverend ""] BRING BACK THE WHIGS |
| ________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 4:16pm - ctB0rderpatrol ""] the_reverend said:how many times will people be idiots about the abortion debate. Ron paul will put in place judges that will overturn rowe v wade. that will cause the states and or counties to once again pass their own laws. since morals are geographically centralized, there will be huge collection of states (where the stupid people that you want to have abortions live). then 16 year old girls will have to travel 400+ miles across state lines to get to abortions. oh yeah, crossing state lines or helping someone cross state lines for an abortion would also be illegal. so go ahead, vote for a world full of unaborted incest and rape babies. the whole crossing state lines thing could have the positive affect of cutting back on teen pregnancies. thats a lot of work and youngters are more unmotivated than ever. and really, states rights aint a bad idea. who are we to push our new england culture and values on anyone else? |
| ________________________________________ [Oct 2,2008 5:05pm - Conservationist ""] ctB0rderpatrol said:states rights aint a bad idea. who are we to push our new england culture and values on anyone else? It would increase political diversity. |