The Faceless post new songs[views:10146][posts:18]_______________________________ [Oct 16,2008 1:36pm - sever ""] http://www.myspace.com/thefaceless spawn of possession worship... but it's good. |
| ___________________________________________ [Oct 16,2008 1:38pm - FuckIsMySignature ""] new songs are more technical i guess. they dont have the feeling of the first album though. big ole meh from me. i'll probably still pick up the cd though. |
| ___________________________________ [Oct 16,2008 1:39pm - narkybark ""] It's definetely different feeling... parts remind me of BTBAM. I'm amused by the number of people who liked the demo version of Ancient better. |
| _____________________________ [Oct 16,2008 1:43pm - mOe ""] I REALLY hope this new album isnt just prog wankery...this band KNOWS how to be heavy...just fuckin do it |
| ____________________________________________ [Oct 16,2008 2:01pm - ConquerTheBaphomet ""] These songs sound good. Made the pre-order. |
| ______________________________ [Oct 16,2008 2:03pm - Mess ""] pro-tools are an hero |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 16,2008 2:53pm - ouchdrummer ""] OH NO. Does it suck? I don't do myspace so i don't know. DAMON!!! Bring the tracks tonight for me to hear. I would be SOOOOOO bummed if the new record is just wanky prog crap. I worship the first record. I practice beats from it in my daily routine, they are NOT allowed to put out a second album that sucks. I won't let them. |
| ___________________________________ [Oct 16,2008 2:55pm - narkybark ""] Already got em, they'll be brought tonight. |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 16,2008 2:59pm - ouchdrummer ""] i figured you would. You know me so well. *blush* |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 16,2008 2:59pm - ouchdrummer ""] How many are there? |
| ___________________________________ [Oct 16,2008 3:01pm - narkybark ""] One brand new one, and a studio version of the one you heard before |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 16,2008 3:04pm - ouchdrummer ""] and the studio version of ancient is worse?! WTF man? |
| _____________________________ [Oct 16,2008 3:05pm - mOe ""] And so far the two are just proggy stuff...no heavy riffs...kind of a shame. I loved how they balanced the two on the first cd. |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 16,2008 3:06pm - ouchdrummer ""] i couldnt get enough of the first one. |
| ___________________________________ [Oct 16,2008 3:09pm - narkybark ""] it's not worse, but it has a way different feel. The guitar has a much more spacey quality to it now, with lot of vibrato and whammy. Bass sound is better. They replaced the synth voice with a robot voice. Uh... well you'll hear it soon enough. |
| ______________________________ [Oct 16,2008 3:22pm - Yeti ""] i'll say it again, damn these "awesome first album" bands. |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 16,2008 4:34pm - ouchdrummer ""] Yeti said:i'll say it again, damn these "awesome first album" bands. and i will say again... it's cause the first record is always the best the band can offer that they've had all the time in the world to perfect. |
| _____________________________ [Oct 16,2008 4:38pm - mOe ""] yea, you have your whole life to write your first album and 6-8 months to write the second one if you're lucky |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 16,2008 5:20pm - immortal13 ""] Akeldama is amazing. I like these songs a lot because I do like progressive music, very much so. I'll admit it's not as heavy as Akeldama, but I will also admit that I still really like these songs. |