.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Conservationist.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Conservationist:839224"][QUOTE="ouchdrummer:839043"]Conservationist- I would say that after an election is over, continuing to point out what you think MIGHT go wrong, and how silly/stupid peoples decisions were to have voted the way they did, when you could be informing people what they should do now to ensure/help prevent the things your predicting, or even to prepare for them if they are really unavoidable.... is all whining. It's to no end, it's complaining, and your not trying to get anywhere with it. Yes sir, thats whining.[/QUOTE] I'm laying the groundwork for a counterattack. I disagree with the candidate, and want to prime people with predictions that they can later see are fulfilled. It is not in my interest to try to "help" the candidate WITH WHOM I HAVE IRRECONCILIABLE IDEOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES. Normally you speak sense, but the above is just stupid hipster talk. I think someone has said this to you, and you felt you got owned, so now you use it on others. What would your logic/debate professors say? I'll tell you: LOL not so fast. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][