.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to dreadkill.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="dreadkill:873049"][QUOTE="xmikex:872318"] There were a couple things I could have done without. #1. The scene with him and his daughter on the wharf. Their relationship was necessary for his character, I get it. But that scene just didn't fit in the film. It was too bright, and used too many wide shots. It went from an Aronofsky film to Sleepless in Seattle for that whole scene, and I just didn't appreciate it. [/QUOTE] that was one of my favorite scenes in the movie, but i agree about the way it was shot. the cinematography in that scene was more polished and typical, while the rest of the movie was grittier and more low-end.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][