.:.:.:.:RTTP.Mobile:.:.:.:.
[<--back] [Home][Pics][News][Ads][Events][Forum][Band][Search]
full forum | bottom

We want SIGS!!!

[views:2528][posts:28]
[poll! to vote:click here] to view:click here]  _____________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 9:50am - RustedAngel ""]
should the_reverend pepperless implement signature attatchments to the board?

meaning you have personalized text attached to each of your messages, or an attatchment image hosted on another server... (certain size only)...

i think it would be cool, and make it easier to scroll down and find certain people's posts if you're in a rush.

:spineyes:
 __________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 9:53am - succubus ""]
the pics make him dizzy...
heh
 __________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 9:55am - succubus ""]
how would you control attachment size limitations?
i have this on my board (which you are no longer a member of btw) lol

and i had to email/mesage people telling them to make their sig smaller...they annoy a lot of people i guess
 _____________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 9:57am - RustedAngel ""]
there's gotta be a way to cap the attatchment size...you're board just doesn't have the option to cap it off. rev the 1337 coding madman could prog it up within minutes i'm sure.

myspace does it, 500k limit on pictures.
 _____________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 9:59am - RustedAngel ""]
btw, it would be fun.
 _______________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:06am - the_reverend ""]
I've been thinking about allowing text for a while,
so you can say something like "8===D, vote T for boners!"
or shroud can put in their web-address.

I'm not allowing pictures as I can't fucking stand boaders with picture sigs. if I did text, it would have a limit of 100-255 chars or something... I don't know though... I guess we'll see what people think. I just hate fucking images.

oh and tom, that 500K limit on pictures for ms is done easily... it's all on upload. I could easily have it so that someone could upload a picture and limit size/res/format.. once you upload something to a server, you have full control.
 _______________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:06am - the_reverend ""]
ps: I voted no
 ____________________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:06am - SmallBrownRatFuck ""]
Yeah, coding a size cap isn't hard at all. Given the complexity of this website, I'm rather sure he could do it quickly.
 ___________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:07am - succubus ""]
the_rev said:
I'm not allowing pictures as I can't fucking stand boaders with picture sigs. if I did text, it would have a limit of 100-255 chars or something... I don't know though... I guess we'll see what people think. I just hate fucking images. >>

yep i knew that...heh
 ____________________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:07am - SmallBrownRatFuck ""]
the_reverend said:ps: I voted no



LOL!
 _______________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:11am - the_reverend ""]
actually, hell.. I could allow images in the sig no problem...
but I would put in a feature to turn them off.
 _______________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:11am - the_reverend ""]
have I mentioned yet that I hate images in sigs?
 ___________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:12am - succubus ""]
:shocked:
 ______________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:15am - RustedAngel ""]
succubus said:the_rev said:
I'm not allowing pictures as I can't fucking stand boaders with picture sigs. if I did text, it would have a limit of 100-255 chars or something... I don't know though... I guess we'll see what people think. I just hate fucking images. >>

yep i knew that...heh



because your a programmer, of course you hate images...

but please, step into the 21st century. hahahahahahahh.
 ______________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:17am - RustedAngel ""]
VOTE YES!!!! DO EITTTTTTTTT!
 _______________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:19am - the_reverend ""]
I was watching one of the new drew carey re-runs and drew was in a Java-programming class. I was all giddy!

just cause you can't post your picture w/ you "enjoying" your pc doesn't mean shit.
 ______________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:27am - RustedAngel ""]
hahahah

oh yeah, why don't you just make an option for people to turn sigs on and off? wouldn't that be included under the "turn pictures off"?
 ______________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:30am - RustedAngel ""]
i can see rev at work getting all his co-workers to vote no.
 ____________________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:31am - SmallBrownRatFuck ""]
Many of my friends are engineers and computer programmers. We all get giddy when someone starts discussing their project or presents a 'how would you code this' type of debate. We're dorky.
 _______________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:31am - the_reverend ""]
if I were going to do that, I could
1) just go in the databases and increase the "no" vote.
2) go to the 100 different computers I have here and vote from all those.
 ______________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:32am - RustedAngel ""]
oh yeah, why don't you just make an option for people to turn sigs on and off? wouldn't that be included under the "turn pictures off"?
 _______________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:34am - the_reverend ""]
it would probably be separate...
as I want to see pictures that people post, but one pictures in sigs.
I could probably add it to the user properties.
hm.
 ______________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:38am - RustedAngel ""]
THERE YOU HAVE IT PEOPLE!

if sigs are implemented, YOU CAN disable them!! so don't vote NO, you have no reason too. hahah.
 ___________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:39am - succubus ""]
lol
 _______________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 10:43am - the_reverend ""]
I could also put in something like other boards have where you get a link to AIM and WWW on the line that a register use (who has a AIM/WWW) with each time they post.
 ____________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 1:10pm - MyDeadDoll ""]
i can go either way on this... yeah
they get annoying, but it's kinda fun
to see what pictures and stuff people
use... so yeah, whatever
 __________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 1:15pm - succubus ""]
the_reverend said:I could also put in something like other boards have


conformist~trying to be like everyone else in the scene
*insert sarcastic emoticon here*
lol

 _____________________________________
[Feb 27,2004 2:43pm - Wee...Bink! ""]
i voted yes.

why the fuck not.
 __________________________________________
[Feb 28,2004 4:35am - TheGreatSpaldino ""]
no... i mean, i like the sig thing... but it doesnt fit with the style of this board.


Reply
[login ]
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
message

top [Vers. 0.12][ 0.008 secs/8 queries][refresh][