.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Uh.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Uh:1197585"]I think my beef with hipster black metal is that especially once you find out it's hipster black metal and that it's not about the hate, misanthropy, depression, anti-christianity, satanism, nihilism, or whatever the fuck, and is casually made with the "hey, I'm bored with grindcore, sludge, deathcore, At The Gates-rip off and retro-thrash metal this week, let's start a black metal band" attitude, it starts to show in the music after a few listens. Not saying all hipster black metal is bad, but the interpretation of the music gets influenced a bit with that context. Like you can begin to hear Wolves in the Throne Room wanting to be Weakling rip offs with an updated indie post rock influence, Woe, especially with their new album, having a hodge podge of different black metal styles with some indie rock parts, Krallice including their overly technical riffing and changes, Ludicra barely being black metal anymore, and Liturgy being total homofags. Context influencing musical appreciation has always been an age old debate. Should context of the music actually influence how much you like a band. Theoretically it's easy to say no... but what if your band plays a Black Sabbath cover but a bit heavier or cleaner or whatever. Is your band actually better than Sabbath now and all their albums should be thrown out? [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.014 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][