Stupid cow gets tattoo of her 152 Facebook friends[views:2235][posts:24]_________________________________________ [Jun 7,2011 7:41pm - largefreakatzero ""] Clearly needs a short upper-cut to her dumb jaw: http://mobile.newser.com/1987/show/dd0c99f...&t=5674ff5b4fb777e580f9685e5c2d7e1b |
| __________________________________ [Jun 7,2011 7:49pm - nekronaut ""] This is the mother of the aborted billboard baby. |
| _________________________________________ [Jun 7,2011 7:50pm - largefreakatzero ""] Officially. |
| __________________________________ [Jun 7,2011 7:57pm - machacho ""] gayer than richard simmons prolapsing man cunt. |
| ________________________________________ [Jun 7,2011 9:49pm - conservationist ""] FAT FUCKER FETUS FONDUE |
| ___________________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 12:52am - FuckIsMySignature ""] that's a whole lotta fail right thar. |
| _____________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 1:20am - the_reverend ""] it looks kind of cool... until their change their picture. then it's going to be expensive to change. |
| _____________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 1:20am - the_reverend ""] wait, only 152 friends? loser much. |
| _________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 6:58am - CurlyRed ""] I am a sociopath hermit and even I have more friends than that. |
| _____________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 11:44am - ouchdrummer ""] the_reverend said:wait, only 152 friends? loser much. yeah, i felt REALLY lame after i said it, but when i first looked at it i said "what's worse, the tattoo itself, or the fact that she's only got 152 friends." lulz |
| ___________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 11:54am - dreadkill ""] i hope some of those friends delete her |
| ___________________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 12:14pm - FuckIsMySignature ""] [img] |
| ___________________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 1:41pm - AndrewBastard NLI ""] Dwyer should get that and cover is ENTIRE BODY |
| ________________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 2:10pm - conservationist ""] Dwyer has too many FB friends for that. He will need another body, possibly an elephant. I fail at Facebook. |
| _______________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 2:24pm - DestroyYouAlot ""] this makes me regret my friendster backpiece. |
| _____________________________ [Jun 8,2011 2:36pm - Lamp ""] ouchdrummer said: the_reverend said:wait, only 152 friends? loser much. yeah, i felt REALLY lame after i said it, but when i first looked at it i said "what's worse, the tattoo itself, or the fact that she's only got 152 friends." lulz Hey, it's more friends than I have on there. |
| ______________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 3:49pm - Alexecutioner ""] i dont know who is the bigger faggot. the person with the tattoo or the person from Gawker that wrote “If this is going to become a trend, then Facebook needs to add a privacy setting that lets you not allow people to get your Facebook profile picture tattooed on a person's arm." a privacy setting for that? really? |
| ______________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 3:53pm - Alexecutioner ""] Lamp said: ouchdrummer said: the_reverend said:wait, only 152 friends? loser much. yeah, i felt REALLY lame after i said it, but when i first looked at it i said "what's worse, the tattoo itself, or the fact that she's only got 152 friends." lulz Hey, it's more friends than I have on there. i bet she only talks to about 10 or so friends out of those 152 in real life and actually hangs out with under 5 of them. even less now that she has this tattoo. loser much? |
| _______________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 3:55pm - DestroyYouAlot ""] Alexecutioner said:i dont know who is the bigger faggot. the person with the tattoo or the person from Gawker that wrote “If this is going to become a trend, then Facebook needs to add a privacy setting that lets you not allow people to get your Facebook profile picture tattooed on a person's arm." a privacy setting for that? really? this just may have been a joke maybe |
| ______________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 4:00pm - Alexecutioner ""] DestroyYouAlot said: Alexecutioner said:i dont know who is the bigger faggot. the person with the tattoo or the person from Gawker that wrote “If this is going to become a trend, then Facebook needs to add a privacy setting that lets you not allow people to get your Facebook profile picture tattooed on a person's arm." a privacy setting for that? really? this just may have been a joke maybe it may have been. but when i read that, i automatically assumed it was some pussy right wing faggot who thinks its all of a sudden an invasion of privacy that someone gets your facebook profile picture tattooed on their body. i wouldnt be surprised. |
| ____________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 4:03pm - Randy_Marsh ""] so..what halpins when a new friend request is made. OH SHIT |
| _____________________________ [Jun 8,2011 4:23pm - Lamp ""] Alexecutioner said: Lamp said: ouchdrummer said: the_reverend said:wait, only 152 friends? loser much. yeah, i felt REALLY lame after i said it, but when i first looked at it i said "what's worse, the tattoo itself, or the fact that she's only got 152 friends." lulz Hey, it's more friends than I have on there. i bet she only talks to about 10 or so friends out of those 152 in real life and actually hangs out with under 5 of them. even less now that she has this tattoo. loser much? Exactly. Even with the low amount of people I have on there, if anything I think I have too many. People who have some ridiculous number of friends like in the thousands are probably just adding every single person they're even marginally acquainted with... why someone needs to keep tabs on the lives of every total stranger they meet is beyond me. |
| __________________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 4:27pm - FuckIsMySignature ""] adding more friends means exposing more people to your music when promoting online. thats only reason i have so many on there. almost at 666 too lol. |
| _______________________________________ [Jun 8,2011 4:58pm - DestroyYouAlot ""] FuckIsMySignature said:adding more friends means exposing yourself online. YEAAAAHH |
| ______________________________ [Jun 8,2011 5:41pm - Pires ""] HOAX http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/06/08/woman...ed-with-152-facebook-friends-faces/ [Updated at 1:59 p.m] When you want to get your name out there - sometimes you've got to come up with clever ways to do it. That's something Rotterdam tattoo artist Dex Moelker and his company clearly hoped for when they were named as the ones who inked the Facebook tattoo requested by a Dutch woman of 152 of her Facebook friends. And boy, did it work. The story spread like a wildfire online. After newspapers and major online outlets, including CNN.com, put the story out – it was a hot-button topic. Ironically, as of this moment more than 7,000 people recommended this story on Facebook – perhaps in part because they thought it was ridiculous. And it turns out, that's just what it was. The tattoo that sparked the Web frenzy isn't real. First off, I think a few people can give a sigh of relief that it isn't real. And we haven't really gone that far off the social media deep end to where our Facebook walls are displayed "Matrix"-style on our arms. As we said before, it wouldn't have been the first time someone tried to capture fame by using a social network site to name their kid or to get a tattoo. In this case it was all about publicity. Moelker just came clean to the Dutch newspaper the Telegraaf, saying it was in fact a publicity stunt. The woman in the video didn't have the tattoo inked during a 30-hour period as the video claimed. "It is a try out tattoo, a transfer, that washes off in a couple of days," he told them. Phew. It may take some scrubbing to get it off, but I guess on the bright side that's all it will take. When it comes to viral videos, you never know what you're going to get (I'm looking at you, Rebecca Black. I still don't get if that song is real). But ironically, in this case, the ink shop got just what it wanted – a lot of free press. Hats off for an international viral campaign. It's not great when media outlets worldwide are duped by viral videos or stories – but if you're looking at it from a marketing perspective – you've got to "like" how well they pulled it off. |