.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Bullshit detector.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Bullshit%20detector:1336258"][QUOTE="Arrow%20NLI:1336242"]Oh, and church attendance figures don't really display the religious OPTIONS allowed to a countries citizens, does it? So it doesn't really say anything about how predominant a faith is in a particular country. Sorry, man. Didn't mean to upset you. Clearly this is a case of a person into religion and history arguing against a guy into black metal and the church-burnings that went on. And in that regard you're right, I probably mispoke as to their motivations. However in general my point stands.[/QUOTE] [quote="Danth's Law"]Danth's Law Someone is wrong on The Internet Danth's Law (also known as Parker's Law) states: “”If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. It was formulated on the popular Roleplaying Game forum, RPG.net and named after the now-banned user who inspired it. As an internet discussion grows and grows, it's often tempting to declare victory and move on, especially if you've rammed the point home too many times and your opponent just ignores everything you say. In this case, declaring victory and moving on may be legitimate and excusable. Unfortunately, the majority of the time, declaring victory is just spin: a last desperate attempt to trick people into believing you came out on top (providing that they don't actually go and read the discussion, of course). Sometimes, the individuals declaring victory may well be convinced that they're right; often they'll have gone into the discussion knowing that they're right and with no possible option that they might be wrong. When combined with the ability to expel someone from the discussion, Danth's Law takes on a more sinister tone - indicating that a group or individual can only defend themselves on their own terms, through the medium of extreme deceit. More specifically, the person declaring themselves victorious against strong opposition generally cites the quantity of opposition as why they won and no longer have to argue to prove their point - after all, if they weren't so right, why would people be so desperate in refuting them with post after post? This may consist of complaining about the opponent's 'way' of arguing, or just the amount of arguing, number of points brought up, or number of people arguing against them as evidence of their victory, as nonsensical and contradictory as that assertion logically is.[/quote] [img]http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbtg3elVRD1qlqvqio1_400.png[/img] [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.010 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][