.:.:.:.:RTTP.Mobile:.:.:.:.
[<--back] [Home][Pics][News][Ads][Events][Forum][Band][Search]
full forum | bottom

why is Apple above the law?

[views:1845][posts:7]
 ____________________________________________
[Feb 20,2016 8:52am - ClothespinnedDick  ""]
Why is Apple allowed to even have the OPTION of saying no, we won't allow the FBI acess to a murderers iPhone contacts and texts?
 ____________________________________
[Feb 20,2016 9:09am - Because..  ""]
Apple protects the powerless.... The helpless... Aginst the tyrants who call themselves the law.
 _____________________________________________
[Feb 20,2016 10:47am - Enquiring faggets  ""]
Tax dodging fagget corporation, products made by almost-slaves so hipster queers can take selfies vs. Uncle Sam's lying, corrupt thug-faggets looking for an excuse to further control unsuspecting faggets.

Solution?

Everyone should be killed.
 _____________________________________________
[Feb 20,2016 10:58am - ClothespinnedDick  ""]
Legal to tap phones if you're suspected of terrorism, legal to seize your home, but APPLE can keep to themselves the content of a nutcase killers texting, call history and fapping apps?! What if it was a kidnapped little non fat white girl and the contents of the iPhone could mean finding her or convicting the kidnapper?
 _____________________________________________
[Feb 20,2016 11:01am - ClothespinnedDick  ""]
And Apple doesn't protect shit, it's just a stunt to get more liberal hipster doufuses to buy Apple and think that by doing so they're somehow "sticking it to the man" whilst twisting their mustaches.
 ____________________________________________
[Feb 20,2016 1:33pm - Enquiring faggets  ""]
Agreed and I hate Apple along with all their fagget fanboys, but I still don't trust the fucking feds.

Short-term, yes unlock the phone. I don't believe for a second they don't already have an existing work-around to do that.
 _____________________________________
[Feb 21,2016 9:56pm - My 2 cents  ""]
Its because of affirmative action quotas they have to meet. Thats why.
 ____________________________________________
[Feb 22,2016 8:47am - ClothespinnedDick  ""]
So, if I'm to believe that the Feds can't acess someone's iPhone, (i don't ), doesn't it seem like some fuckery, that Apple is allowed to have a system of communication in which millions of people, in America alone, are "protected" from the govt being able to see the information they exchange?
Even typing it felt absurd.


Reply
[login ]
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
message

top [Vers. 0.12][ 0.068 secs/8 queries][refresh][