Someone you'd like to make out with...[views:8354][posts:54]_____________________________________ [Oct 13,2003 1:00pm - RustedAngel ""] such silky smooth lips you'd swear it was your girlfriend going down on you.:shocked::spineyes: [img] |
| _______________________________________ [Oct 13,2003 1:24pm - joe/notcommon ""] [img] |
| ______________________________________ [Oct 13,2003 3:57pm - the_reverend ""] tom: So you all think it's a big joke and you all just are quick to put the blame on me. Some fucking friends I have. I know I made a mistake but how many of you have gotten drunk and done something stupid? Don't pass judgement on me. I specifically told Tom in the bar that I made a mistake and I DIDN'T want them on the website. He still disregarded that and he has no right to have put them on here. You wanna see me be a bitch? You all wanna pass judgement some more and make a joke out of it? Well fuck you. I want them down by the end of tonight or I'm calling my fucking lawyer. |
| __________________________________ [Oct 13,2003 4:00pm - succubus ""] i bought him that lip thing! |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 13,2003 6:31pm - dirtykittie ""] Tripp!!!!! cuz he's fucking hot!!!! |
| ______________________________________ [Oct 13,2003 7:46pm - the_reverend ""] FACT 1: all hot guys are homosexual FACT 2: I'm not homosexual |
| __________________________________________ [Oct 13,2003 7:47pm - thegreatspaldino ""] the_reverend said: FACT 2: I'm not homosexual =[ |
| __________________________________ [Oct 13,2003 7:53pm - succubus ""] sorry spaldino he's myne he is still hot though>:] |
| _______________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 9:08am - joe/notcommon ""] wait a minute, not all hot guys are gay. Alvarez from Oz isn't gay. He says in the show that he knows he is hot. Adabesse on the other hand, is not hot but really gay. Atleast he never says he is hot, but he definately is into dudes. I am probably the ugliest person around, does that make me the least gay? |
| _________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 10:09am - xmikex ""] i like my beer cold, my tv loud and my homosexuals FLAMING |
| ________________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 10:33am - joe/notcommon ""] xmikex, i heard you are single now. maybe we can do dinner and a movie? :shocked: |
| _______________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 11:04am - the_reverend ""] weird.. I thought this was a thread about making out with me. but you two guys decided to turn it into some sort of liebmacher fest. thanks. |
| ___________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 11:13am - succubus ""] sigh ... i should have never bought you that raspberry chapstick dammit now i fear tables are turning...am I going to make the Rev gay? |
| _______________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 11:22am - the_reverend ""] not for all the tea in china. not if you could sing like a bird. not for all north carolina. I will never be into guys, they are too hairy, smelly, and covered in dicks+balls |
| ___________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 11:39am - succubus ""] hahahaha are you listening to that CD now? PS: i like your smell..call me crazy:spineyes: |
| _________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 12:06pm - retzam ""] the_reverend said:FACT 1: all hot guys are homosexual FACT 2: I'm not homosexual Oh Oh! I learned how to do this in numbers class! Ok, here it goes: Assuming the two facts you gave are true, I can make another true statement: You are not hot. Hurray for numbers class! |
| _______________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 12:29pm - the_reverend ""] Math Proof youi mean. p => q q => r therefore p =>r however, joe/nc took this and made an incorrect statement by taking p => q q => r therefore r => p which isn't correct cause they don't have a <=> relationship. you can't go backwards in an implies statement joe! you get a 0% on this test, you should have slacked off. (did I mention I have a computer science degree?) |
| ___________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 1:00pm - ratt_mowe ""] [img] yum :spineyes: |
| ______________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 1:02pm - the_reverend ""] psst... he's legal now.... hit that shit! |
| ___________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 1:03pm - ratt_mowe ""] uhhh what do you think happened when we went to PA? |
| __________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 1:04pm - succubus ""] ummm then post pictures so we can see the sexiness! c'mon! |
| ___________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 1:05pm - ratt_mowe ""] hellooooooooo you gotta pay for that shit! |
| __________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 1:08pm - succubus ""] let's trade :spineyes: |
| ______________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 1:09pm - the_reverend ""] I think there is going to be some anal ez.. with numbing gel in these pictures. it'll be on the bed-table next to the bible! |
| _______________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 5:50pm - DeOdiumMortis ""] succubus said:now i fear tables are turning...am I going to make the Rev gay? No, Spiderman will make him gay. That's fact #3. |
| __________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 6:05pm - succubus ""] actually he loves Wolverine:spineyes: |
| __________________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 6:17pm - thegreatspaldino ""] SNNKT! |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 8:04pm - BornSoVile ""] dirtykittie said:Tripp!!!!! cuz he's fucking hot!!!! From the Unseen? |
| _____________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 8:19pm - dirtykittie ""] No, I meant Tripp Eisen. |
| ________________________________ [Oct 14,2003 9:33pm - retzam ""] the_reverend said:Math Proof youi mean. p => q q => r therefore p =>r however, joe/nc took this and made an incorrect statement by taking p => q q => r therefore r => p which isn't correct cause they don't have a <=> relationship. you can't go backwards in an implies statement joe! you get a 0% on this test, you should have slacked off. (did I mention I have a computer science degree?) Well, Rev, not quite. You see, I used the Law of Detachment to state my fact. Your example shows the Chain Rule. See the difference? |
| ______________________________________ [Oct 15,2003 2:10am - the_reverend ""] http://www.creatavision.com/law-of-detachment.htm ? |
| _______________________________________ [Oct 15,2003 2:28am - DeOdiumMortis ""] The law of inverse proportions. Aka the more you like me the more I hate you. This works especially well with childish incompetant girls. |
| __________________________________ [Oct 15,2003 5:10am - succubus ""] i guess this thread took another turn |
| ________________________________ [Oct 15,2003 2:58pm - retzam ""] the_reverend said:http://www.creatavision.com/law-of-detachment.htm ? That isnt the Law of Detachment I was refering to. An example of what I was talking about would be: If a, then b. Assuming a is true, then b must also be true. The two facts you gave ("All hot guys are homosexual";"I am not homosexual") would act as a, so be would be "I am not hot". My math teacher would be so proud. |
| ______________________________________ [Oct 15,2003 3:11pm - the_reverend ""] retzam said:That isnt the Law of Detachment I was refering to. An example of what I was talking about would be: If a, then b. Assuming a is true, then b must also be true. The two facts you gave ("All hot guys are homosexual";"I am not homosexual") would act as a, so be would be "I am not hot". My math teacher would be so proud. no... (s)he wouldn't.. cause you got it wrong. that is a false argument. that's the type of arguement that people use to convince people of things all the time... you need dual cuasal relationships to allow for that... aka bidirectionalimplies. <=> a since implies (=>) only allows a relationship to flow one direction. I can prove it with set theory and some nice venn diagrams if you want me to... |
| _________________________________ [Oct 15,2003 3:14pm - joostin ""] xmikex said:i like my beer cold, my tv loud and my homosexuals FLAMING que: over the rainbow |
| ________________________________ [Oct 15,2003 4:48pm - retzam ""] the_reverend said:retzam said:That isnt the Law of Detachment I was refering to. An example of what I was talking about would be: If a, then b. Assuming a is true, then b must also be true. The two facts you gave ("All hot guys are homosexual";"I am not homosexual") would act as a, so be would be "I am not hot". My math teacher would be so proud. no... (s)he wouldn't.. cause you got it wrong. that is a false argument. that's the type of arguement that people use to convince people of things all the time... you need dual cuasal relationships to allow for that... aka bidirectionalimplies. <=> a since implies (=>) only allows a relationship to flow one direction. I can prove it with set theory and some nice venn diagrams if you want me to... Well, your statement is a bidirectional statement. You see, your conditional statement ("All hot guys are homosexuals") can be changed into the form: If a guy is hot, then he is a homosexual. This means that...fuck your right. Nevermind. I don't know why, but before now I didn't realize that this statement doesnt mean that all homosexuals are hot. I renounce my argument. |
| ______________________________________ [Oct 16,2003 10:25pm - joe did it ""] [img] |
| ________________________________________ [Oct 16,2003 11:02pm - joe/notcommon ""] joe did it said:[img] haha, thanks |
| _________________________________ [Oct 17,2003 2:01am - Terence ""] joe/notcommon said:joe did it said:[img] Nice...fuckin, life. |
| _______________________________________ [Oct 17,2003 8:39am - joe/notcommon ""] Terence said:joe/notcommon said:joe did it said:[img] Nice...fuckin, life. i'll ram that bass right up her metalcore vagina |
| ________________________________ [Oct 20,2003 6:17pm - retzam ""] Bump [img] You know you want her. |
| _______________________________ [Oct 20,2003 6:25pm - Hoser ""] Arch Enemy is full of fun hooks and tits to boot!! |
| _______________________________________ [Oct 20,2003 6:27pm - DeOdiumMortis ""] It's too bad she sucks, and not in a good way. |
| _________________________________ [Oct 20,2003 10:22pm - retzam ""] DeOdiumMortis said:It's too bad she sucks, and not in a good way. Really? I think she is a great vocalist! |
| ________________________________________ [Oct 20,2003 10:37pm - DeOdiumMortis ""] I didn't mind her at first, seemed more lively and into it than the older singer. But since then it looks like they're going the way of the big-headed rock stars, not full-blown yet but they're well on their way if they don't catch themselves first. Whenever anyone wants to listen to Arch Enemy I just put on Carcass' Heartwork. That's my tastes. |
| _________________________________ [Oct 20,2003 10:39pm - retzam ""] DeOdiumMortis said:I didn't mind her at first, seemed more lively and into it than the older singer. But since then it looks like they're going the way of the big-headed rock stars, not full-blown yet but they're well on their way if they don't catch themselves first. Whenever anyone wants to listen to Arch Enemy I just put on Carcass' Heartwork. That's my tastes. Yes, yes, I happen to like Arch Enemy more than Carcass, but I have to say that Heartwork is a fucking awesome album and definately Carcass's best work. |
| _______________________________ [Oct 22,2003 7:34pm - Devin ""] i think arch enemy are still goin great. and angela's fuckin foxy! |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 22,2003 10:00pm - dyingmuse ""] id like to make out with myself:sctachy: |
| ____________________________________ [Oct 23,2003 3:09am - MyDeadDoll ""] dyingmuse said:id like to make out with myself:sctachy: I always make out with myself.... |