.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to BobNOMAAMRooney nli.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="BobNOMAAMRooney%20nli:939832"][QUOTE="whatever:939826"]No, this is a woman's brain in action - changing her mind about this being her last post! You called yourself a theoretical dude. Enough said.[/QUOTE] You can't read a simple sentence, you stupid broad. [QUOTE="BobNOMAAMRooney%20nli:939822"]Kind of hard to be [B] gay for a theoretical dude[/B] if [B]I[/B] have a theoretical vagina. [/QUOTE] Let me break it down for your puny feminine brain. 1.You insinuated that I had both a vagina and a boyfriend in an attempt to insult me with some highly intelligent homophobic humor. 2. I responded by wondering how I could be gay for a theoretical boyfriend if I also had a vagina, as that would make me a woman and engaged in a heterosexual relationship. It'd be just as retarded if I were to say "Oh man, if you had a dick you'd totally fuck women!" 3. You respond in turn by showcasing the piss poor reading comprehension of a woman with a "proven IQ of 137"[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][