.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to BobNOMAAMRooney.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="BobNOMAAMRooney:937036"][QUOTE="niccolai:937014"] Take a look in thier red before they became a democratic monarchy. National debt was hillarious. and so wasn't the ethnic clensing, health care system, pre-wed pregnancy rates, sterilization chapter, etc. Not a place I'd consider a model for government.[/QUOTE] Sweden became a Constitutional Monarchy on August 20, 1772 (although the strength of parliament ebbed for a number of decades after that point). I don't see how the Republic that preceded Gustav III's new constitution could have implemented Socialism and had it fail considering that economic theory wouldn't emerge for another 50 some odd years. Sweden has become more prosperous since removing political power from the monarchy in the 1970s and somehow managed to put together a strong economy with the Social Democrats as the dominant political party in Swedish politics, just as they had been before 1974.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][