.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to arilliusbm.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="arilliusbm:1108784"]Considering we've only really been 'active' as a species for 200,000 years on a planet that's roughly 4.5 billion years old, I'd assume that these planets a.) had life in the past but are desolate wastelands b.) had intelligent life at some point but not anymore c.) are savage planets with beasts like dinosaurs- no intelligent life yet. d.) are planets with molten rock and nothing else e.) have intelligent life but don't have technology yet f.) have intelligent life equal or superior to ours. Given the infamous drake equation, i'd say there are many, many civilaztions in our galaxy alone. To put it bluntly, if they found 500 planets in a habitable zone and if 1% of these planets had intelligent life, that's still 5 planet right there. Considering there's a possibilty of 1,000,000 habitable planets in our galaxy (given the estimation by the scientist), that'd still be 10,000 planets with life. Each galaxy as the possibilty of an abundance of life, and the estimation is that there are 1,000,000,000+ galaxies in space. I think it's safe to assume that the probablity of life is quite high. I havent told you guys but I've been building a spaceship for the past 10 years. It's currently in my basement. I'll be back soon, don't worry. Tootles. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][