.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to anonymous.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="anonymous:1151717"]The security services' mishandling of police informer David Myatt, is symptomatic of the chaotic and dangerous state of the British intelligence services. The misuse of anti terror laws and the failure to correctly monitor dangerous 'operatives' like David Myatt, will lead to more innocent people dying in botched 'honeypot' operations. Here is some background on the British Government's failure to protect civilians in the 1999 London bomb attacks. In 1999 a young nazi called David Copeland detonated three nail-bombs in London. Many people were killed in these attacks, including a pregnant woman and her unborn child. It was only after Copeland planted and detonated the third bomb, that he was caught. At that time David Myatt had been involved in various violent neo-nazi organizations - notably Combat18 and then later, the National Socialist Movement. Copeland was a member of the NSM. Some people believe that these organizations had been set up by MI5 as 'honeypots' to attract violent nazis like Copeland, so that Myatt could report them to the police before they had a chance to do anything dangerous. If we accept that the NSM was an MI5 sponsored organization, there is a problem. If Myatt was doing his job, why did he let Copeland go on the rampage and kill all those people? One explanation is that the security services set up a dangerously provocative neo-nazi organisation, gave total control to David Myatt and then completely failed to monitor his activities. The opposing view is that David Myatt is not a police informer and The National Socialist Movement was a genuine nazi organization. This was the defence used by the British security services in 1999. The police and the Government claimed that they could not have known in advance about David Copeland's murderous plans, (but as you will read later, this has been exposed as a lie). However, even If we do accept this excuse, it only raises further questions about the British security services' ability to protect innocent civilians from terrorists. For example, why didn't the security services have Myatt and his friends under constant surveillance? Its not as if there was anything covert about David Myatt's political activities. Throughout the 1990s Myatt was openly endorsing terrorism on the internet, mostly writing under his own name. This is Myatt calling for bloodshed in one of his internet tracts: "The change we desire and need can only be brought about by the shedding of blood and the destruction of everything which is anti-Aryan. We must be prepared to ruthlessly sabotage, destroy, undermine and disrupt in any way the infrastructure of our societies. [ See 'System Breakdown' and the other covert pamphlets in circulation.]" David Myatt's 'covert pamphlets' also included a guide on how to construct nail-bombs; exactly the same weapon which David Copeland chose for his terrorist attacks. Are we really supposed to believe that the authorities didn't know Myatt was publishing hate material endorsing terrorism? Well, yes apparently, because that was exactly what the Blair Government told the public at the time. If we fast forward to the present day, it is clear that the Government was lying to the bomb victims' families in 1999. David Myatt is still openly endorsing terrorism on the internet and nothing is being done to stop him. The following is from a 'question and answer' section from one of Myatt's fake Muslim websites: "Q. Is the targeting of innocent bystanders by suicide bombers something that Islam should allow, or encourage. A. The view that I [David Myatt] and many other Muslims, world-wide, incline toward is that Martyrdom Operations [suicide bombings] are lawful, according to the Quran and Sunnah." "...........which view of mine is that such operations [suicide bombings] are legitimate........." David Myatt was unmasked on national television as the publisher of the hate material which lead to Copeland's campaign of mass murder. Millions of people saw this programme and the Government can no longer pretend that it is not aware of David Myatt's activities. This leads inexorably to three main conclusions. Firstly, Myatt's websites are now and always were, officially sponsored by the security services. Secondly, the security services made a terrible mistake in 1999 that cost people their lives. Thirdly, the Government lied to cover it up. But where does that leave us if we now accept that David Myatt is employed by the Government? After all, when the 'honeypot' strategy was used in 1999 it ended in tragedy with weak Government ministers refusing to accept responsibility for the dreadful mistake they had made. Their mistake was to entrust innocent people's lives to an unreliable, violent, ex-convict. Now the same flawed strategy is being used with Islamic terrorism and worse still, it has been put in the hands of the same untrustworthy person - David Myatt. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.016 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][