.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to eddie.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="eddie:1227618"][QUOTE="ArrowHeadNLI:1227544"]I grew up in the 80's hardcore scene around here. I never once heard the term "thrash" used to describe hardcore punk. I heard it used by Skaters to describe pretty much any music they could skate to, which is actually where (and why) the term was born. But outside THRASH, I've never heard it used to describe anything but THRASH - IE the entire 1984 bay area metal movement. Metallica, Megadeth, Annihilator, Forbidden, Exodus, Anthrax, etc.... Maybe now, retrospectively, people like to use the term differently (much like "hardcore" has been bastardized) but then and there, it's what defined the genre. And I will definitely go on record that it all started with Dave Mustaine. Before Dave, THRASH was just british heavy metal.[/QUOTE] marketing. I'll have to find a source to site. one minute(or a day) please. Being in medias res doesn't make you "right", just means that’s how it was accepted in 1984 New England. I like this argument, I don't think many of even get my point, this is not a "it's blacken death!, no it's deathblack" fight. not enough people understand why its ok for labels to change. It is a way for the brain to store data, not what could be called "factual" because it often changes over time to accommodate different new information. Inherently it solidifies over generations, and between regions. To see how language changes over time is interesting. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][