.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Boozegood.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Boozegood:1339994"][QUOTE="ShadowSD:1339991"]Well, then my error is clear, not realizing the pistol fell into the semi-auto category as well; since it is, you're right, it would have the same kill capacity, but it would also be addressed by the same legislation one would think. (I got thrown because I thought the pistol was being cited as a non semi-auto that nonetheless did damage, not sure why the example was raised then). [/QUOTE] Okay than what about bolt action? Do you think they fire at a some sort of snails pace as well? [youtube=gX6Twd0Rkpc] Or how about pump action? [youtube=RIxKAodkSVc] Or lever action? [youtube=OuKz8brpH0I] Or a single action revolver? [youtube=cGaYqd9Pjlg] None of those are semi-automatic. This is an example of an automatic-weapon: [youtube=RR50Zie0Oko] It's also me :). (I didn't pick the music). [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][