.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Arrow NLI.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Arrow%20NLI:1340178"][QUOTE="ShadowSD:1340175"] Multiple rounds fired in quick succession didn't exist in the days of the writing of the second amendment so often cited to justify that ability. Is this really an insignificant point?[/QUOTE] Insignificant? Yes. The intent behind the constitutional amendment was the ability to arm ourselves equally to our government or any invading nation. As their guns got more powerful, so do ours. Pretty sure the amendment had zero to do with hunting, or home robbery. In fact, when the constitution was written, did people even lock their doors against their neighbors? No. They didn't.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.006 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][